Introduction.
My Simple Two-by-Four Approach.
What We Will Need To Play This Game.
The Big Picture.
The Economy.
The Business Cycle.
Seeing The Market's Big Picture.
Three Classic Trading Strategies.
A Closer Look At Market Cycles.
Investment Wisdom.
A Closer Look at Miscellaneous Bits of Investment Wisdom.
Summary.
If you are like me, you've grown up in a place and time where society has encouraged us to get a good education, to work hard, and to play by the rules. We're told, if we do this, we should be able to get a good job. Having a good job enables us to purchase the goods and services that we're conditioned to believe that we need to be happy and live The American Dream. We're also told to save and invest some of our earnings to meet our future needs, like buying a house, sending a child to college, to buy a farm, a ranch or some other type of dream business, or to just achieve Financial Freedom (i.e., to be able to retire). Starting or owning a small business is one way to invest for the future, but this approach is no slam-dunk guarantee of success. In fact, most small businesses fail. Alternatively, we can invest in our education and skills; and historically speaking, this approach has always paid attractive dividends. But if we ever want to stop working, we still need a way to save for retirement. Society says we need to turn to the banking system and Wall Street. The big problem with simple bank savings accounts, money market accounts and most CDs is that the rate of return almost never exceeds the rate of inflation after taxes. Sure, our savings will be safe (at lease safe to the FDIC Limit), but we will still lose purchasing power over longer periods of time. So, that leaves Wall Street, which often panders to our natural Lottery-Ticket mentality — we all want to get rich quick without having to investing too much time, money or effort, which is an approach that almost never works in real life. Conversely, getting rich slow-and-steady does work, and almost anyone can do it. Most start by investing in the latest hot (five star) fund or stock, only to find that they are buying-in near the top. That's what happened to me, and many others like me. Often, the only reason my investments were getting bigger was because I kept adding new money every month; and if I stopped adding money, I often found the value of my investments going down. It is not uncommon for new investors to find themselves buying high and selling low, the exact opposite of what we should be doing. Many give up, thinking "This game is just rigged against me." I did not give up, thinking "Others I've met were able to do this and I was going to figure it out." In time, I was able to figure out that much of what we're told and believe about trading and investing on Wall Street is just plain wrong or simply wrong for us in our particular situation. There's a reason why The Smart Money (the pros) make money on Wall Street off the backs of, well let's just say, not yet smart money. In this paper, I explain what does work and why, and what we need to know and do to more effectually grow our savings to meet our future needs.
Let's start with my simple 2-by-4 Trading and Investing Methodology that introduces two goals and four rules to achieving those goals. First let me say that we need to always think like an investor but understanding that every investment begins and ends with a trade. We want to master the mechanics of trading to better achieve our investment objectives. To that end, I have two goals: A primary and a secondary; and a set of four simple rules that once mastered make it much easier to be successful in the market for tradable securities.
Our Primary Goal should be to always maintain Consistently Profitable Trader (CPT) status. You may be thinking, my primary goal is to generate wealth and grow the size of my account. If we were to plot an equity growth curve (the value of our account over equal measures of time, like at the end of every month, quarter, or year), that line should generally go from the lower left to the upper right on that chart (from less value to more; and in time, enough value to live on). I know from firsthand experience that the best way to generate wealth and grow the size of any account is to be a CPT. A CPT is not someone who never makes a mistake, never has a losing trade, nor has an equity drawdown, as the name might suggest. A CPT is someone who can reliably generate more profit than loss, always puts more money into their account than they lose in their average Operational Timeframe (OT). Examples of an OT include an economic boom-bust cycle, a year, a quarter, a month, a week, or a day; and can also be any multiple of the prior single examples, like every 18 months. It is best to start with a broader OT, like the economy's boom-bust cycle (the broadest trading range), because those OTs are easiest to earn CPT status. CPT status is of primary importance because compounding will naturally occur over time and will magnify whatever trading results we realize over any OT. A string of profits, no matter how small, will cause an equity growth curve to turn up over time, a very desirable outcome, and after many years can allow us to retire in comfort. But a string of losses (like a string of unnecessary expenditures) can simply hollow out a savings account and can force you to work in a more traditional job for the rest of your life. Note that capital losses cause us to not only lose prior savings, but also the growth in those savings and the time it took to earn that growth. Capital losses force us to reset our investment clock, but we can never redo any prior interval of life; and this is why maintaining CPT status should always be the primary goal. The easiest way to attain and maintain CPT status is to only take on trades (investments) that will pay us to hold and that are likely to yield an acceptable profit sooner or later, and to simply avoid all trades that require good luck or skills that we have yet to master. Do not dismiss the importance of this primary objective. Anyone who fails to realize and maintain CPT status is very unlikely to ever realize and maintain real long-term growth on their savings when exposed to higher yielding market forces. Cyclically erratic (volatile) market forces allow us to Buy Low and Sell High, which most people mistakenly assume is the primary goal, but is in fact too simplistic, far easier said than done, and not the only way to achieve and maintain CPT status. So, our primary goal is to do what we reliably can to grow the size of our account (i.e., to save money on a regular basis and to only doing those things that are very likely to yield a positive rate of return sooner or later).Our Secondary Goal should be to maintain CPT status in our Optimally Effective Timeframe (OET). Rate of return is a function of time and ability. A dollar made in a week has a higher rate of return than a dollar made in two weeks. Compounding higher rates of return causes our equity curve to turn up sooner and move up quicker. It is always best to make money as quickly as possible. But there is a big problem with this secondary goal, the quicker we try to make a profit, the harder it becomes and the more likely it will be that we are unable to achieve and maintain CPT status, which can cause our equity curve to turn down. In fact, way less than 1% of all market participants will ever achieve and maintain daily CPT status, and that is why most wannabes day-traders get wiped out. But anybody can achieve CPT status over an economic boom-bust cycle, most can grow to achieve quarterly CPT status, and some may be able to achieve monthly CPT status, if they think like an investor and properly apply the following trading rules. So, this secondary goal has us keep the bulk of our capital focused on our best OET, while we use a small percentage to probe the next slightly quicker timeframe (improve our trading skills). Once we start to realize CPT status in the next quicker timeframe, we can then slowly increase the size and number of our positions to yield that higher rate of return, while we start to probe the next slightly quicker timeframe. At some point, we will simply be unable to achieve CPT status in the next quicker time, and the current CPT timeframe will be our Optimally Effective Timeframe, the best rate of return we're capable of earning. But please understand that markets can change and so can our ability to master new skills that work in the current environment. So, our OET can and will change overtime. We need to adjust accordingly to always earn our best possible rate of return, which may require us to patiently hold a survivable investment in the next longer timeframe to maintain CPT status. It helps us to think in terms of our best average OET given current market conditions. It's okay to have an occasional drawdown when that investment is likely to yield an acceptable profit sooner or later in the next longer timeframe. Work to realize your best possible rate of return while maintaining CPT status.
Our Primary and Secondary Goals require us to earn money at the best rate of return the market and our skills permit. Learn, and in time master, the following rules and you too will be able to achieve these two goals.
This simply 2X4 approach has empowered me to attain CPT status in a consistent monthly average, my OET. It is rare that I have an unprofitable month; but when I do, it is because I'm taking a planned stop-loss that fortifies returns in subsequent months, thus making my Twelve-Trailing-Month (TTM) average consistently profitable. This approach has enabled me to reach our Financial Freedom Number (the amount of money we needed to earn every month on average to quit our jobs and just live off our savings). I will say more about these rules, why they work, and how to make them even more effect in the balance of this paper. But first we must address some basic information, to build a proper foundation to stand upon.
There are a number of things we will need to have and know to be effective (to earn money) in this Wall Street Markets (trading and investing) game.
Warning: There are two less noble secondary purposes for the existence of Wall Street markets. These markets allow Wall Street professionals to get access to your savings. These professionals literally feed at your expense. You must pay to play on Wall Street. But you don't have to pay that much, and thanks to zero-fee trading commissions, you can now pay even less. But rest assured, Wall Street professionals have many ways to feed on your hard earned savings. Furthermore, Wall Street markets can provide a venue for individual entertainment and stimulus (e.g., a casino). If this is your primary motivation, don't be surprised if it costs you money, just like every other entertaining activity. If you want to make money on Wall Street, become a professional or just focus on the primary purposes bolded above.
Authors Note: I've been doing this now for over two and half decades and I know for a fact that it's not that hard to make a little money here and there, over and over again, and all this can compound to a very considerable sum in time; but I also have to acknowledge that all of my failures to grow real wealth have always been due to just a few BIG mistakes. Because investing is naturally risky, there will be losses; and not all losses can be avoided, but most can be minimized. The pros say that it helps to think of losses caused by normal market risks as a cost of being in this business, a business expense that can be managed. Furthermore, I believe that anybody can learn to make these small profits associated with small risks, but most become impatient and take on more risk to magnify their rate of return. Truth be told, most of us can learn how to get away with a little extra risk most of the time. Some of us can actually get good at managing bigger risks (i.e., learn how to play a Winner's Game). We're all subject to a lucky streak in bull markets, which begs the ultimate question. "Am I clearly able to play the Winner's Game?" Honestly, most should confess the answer is "No, my skills are not there, yet!"It's very important to understand that money lost by the beginner version of us cannot grow to support the retired version of us. Ideally, we should never put on a trade that can, sooner or later, result in a big permanent loss of capital (our hard-earned savings). I believe this is what Warren Buffett is talking about. We simply must avoid excessively risky trades and investments that can easily result in a permanent loss of our savings that need time to grow to fund our retirement goals. We should ask, "What's the likely average cost, worst-case cost, and what are the odds?" (We'll talk more about how to answer these questions later.) We only want to take on risks that are bearable and that we can manage, risks that can be justified by likely returns (i.e., the average loss is easily overcome by the average gain, and the worst-case loss will never kill our account and make us start from scratch again), because sooner or later the odds will catch-up with everyone, and a big risk can turn into a big mistake that can wiped-out months and sometimes years of savings and compound growth. We simply must learn how to manage the risks we take and avoid the risks that we cannot manage or afford, risks that can result in a big mistake.Warren Buffett likes to say, "I only have two rules." "Rule No. 1: Never Lose Money." and "Rule No. 2: Never Forget Rule No. 1."
To understand the irrationality of the stock prices, imagine that you and Mr. Market are partners in a private business. Each day without fail, Mr. Market quotes a price at which he is willing to either buy your interest or sell you his. The business that you both own is fortunate to have stable economic characteristics, but Mr. Market's quotes are anything but. For you see, Mr. Market is emotionally unstable. Some days, Mr. Market is cheerful and can only see brighter days ahead. On these days, he quotes a very high price for shares in your business. At other times, Mr. Market is discouraged and seeing nothing but trouble ahead, quotes a very low price for your shares in the business.
Mr. Market has another endearing characteristic, said Graham. He does not mind being snubbed. If Mr. Market's quotes are ignored, he will be back again tomorrow with a new quote. Graham warned his students that it is Mr. Market's pocketbook, not his wisdom, that is useful. If Mr. Market shows up in a foolish mood, you are free to ignore him or take advantage of him, but it will be disastrous if you fall under his influence.
Mr. Buffett cautions investors to never forget that stocks are simply a fractional ownership claim on a business and bonds are simply a loan to a business or government entity; and the rate of return on both investments depends on: 1) how much you pay for that investment (the cost to get in), and 2) on the future economic prospects and prudence of the issuer of that security (the tangible form of the investment). To be a successful investor, one needs good business judgment to understand the likely future economic value of an investment opportunity and the ability to protect oneself from the emotional whirlwind that Mr. Market unleashes.
Benjamin Graham had another popular saying that is worth considering in this context:
The Market is both a Voting and a Weighing Machine
In the short run, the market is a voting machine; but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.
Mr. Graham is basically telling us that over shorter periods of time, traders and investors buy and sell based on what they think near-term future prices are likely to be, and as a consequence actually drive near-term prices accordingly, which can seem a little crazy relative to the underlying realities. But over longer periods of time, thanks to actual earnings and economic reports, we're all better equipped to understand how well or poorly the businesses and governments that issued our investments are in fact doing — are they creating real economic value or not, and are they able to make the expected future payments or not? — and all that also drives market prices accordingly. So, market prices both anticipate and track the underlying economic realities of the entities that issue those investable securities.
We can use fundamental analysis (how the business makes money) to understand what could be a good investment, and when it is better to be a buyer or a seller of that good investment (i.e., how to effectively take advantage of the Market's Nature). Unfortunately, mastering fundamental analysis is no simple task; it's functionally equivalent to earning an MBA in Accounting, Finance, and Economics. An alternative approach (assuming we can find a good investment — more on this later), we can use technical analysis (use the Market's Collective Wisdom as expressed in market prices seen over longer periods of time), to understand when it is better to be a buyer or a seller. Technical analysis is a skill that is much easier to master and can also greatly improve our odds of success.
Ideally, we'd use fundamental analysis to find good investments, and to establish good working prices levels for buying at discount prices and selling at a premium, and then use technical analysis to optimize our actual buying and selling — the true professional approach. We'll talk more about all this later. But first we must get through the following preliminary stuff.
The balance of this paper looks at The Big Picture, The Economy, The Business Cycle, Market Cycles and other related historic patterns and various bits of trading and investing wisdom to better identify low-risk, high-odds trading opportunities in support of becoming a Consistently Profitable Trader (CPT), the Primary Goal of my Simple 2-by-4 Approach. A CPT is someone who can grow the size of their brokerage account over time because they can (initially) learn how to avoid making big mistakes (trades that can result in a permanent loss of capital) and in time develop the real ability to effectively manage trades that can yield an above average compound rate of return on their savings, and the only reason to put precious time, effort, and investment capital at risk of a loss. To learn how to intelligently visit the intersection of Main Street and Wall Street.
Prices for investable securities naturally trade up and down over time. The big problem is that it is very hard to know where prices will go next. Generally speaking, there is a fair amount of randomness and even a little madness in the Markets for investable (tradable) securities (every investment begins and ends with a trade). It can sometimes seem like the Markets are just a Crap Shoot that have no social or economic value. Wall Street Markets can sure be a gambling venue, if we approach with that or some other counterproductive mindset. Alternatively, if we approach the Stock and Bond Markets with a rational, confident, and prudent business mindset, it becomes possible to appreciate the real social and economic value introduced above — to save for the future and to diversify risk. Wall Street Markets allow us all to both take advantage of longer-term economic growth and to also take shorter-term advantage of natural random price swings and occasional irrational trading behavior. This apparent madness (irrational trading behavior) is often due to short-term psychological factors associated with our own unchecked emotions (e.g., fear, greed, and sensation seeking), and our collective ability to talk ourselves into beliefs that are detrimental to our financial health. These are beliefs that are not always true or relevant to our particular situation (as first documented in 1841 by Charles Mackay in his ground-breaking book Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds — Yes, the markets have changed a lot since the 1800's; but human nature, not so much). We need to learn how to invest with the crowd when the crowd is acting rational, to trade against the crowd when the crowd is acting irrational, and to understand how to recognize the difference.
Markets like to march to a popular narrative that can drive prices to unsupportable extremes. For example, when the broader market trend is up, the market talking heads like to tout bullish stories that tend to drive that uptrend further along. The opposite is also true when the trend is down. But sooner or later, that trend will become overdone and need to correct to better reflect the likely underlying economics. If we apply appropriate financial wisdom and some rational analysis to available information, it's not that hard to see the big picture, to understand the collective Message of the Markets. We want to take advantage of prices that can help us reach our financial goals. We want to trade with the broader market trend when that narrative is likely to be true and not overdone. We also want to ignore the Message of the Market when that narrative is likely to be false, when prices have run too far (e.g., when prices fail to move up on more good news or fail to go down on move bad news). Unfortunately, the message of the markets (i.e., prices and related economic data) is not always clear (especially in the short-run) and even when the message is clear, it is not always right, and it is always subject to change. However, in the long-run market prices are ultimately a function of real economic growth, which is ultimately a function of greater economic output to meet a higher consumer demand for more or better goods and services. This increase in output is ultimately derived from more hours of work or more productively per hour of work (i.e., more people working and/or working with better tools and techniques). In the figure we see U.S. economic growth over a recent 35 year period (in terms of U.S. GDP, click on the figure to see a larger, current version) and of the biggest and best part of the U.S. stock market (the S&P 500, ticker $SPX just above GDP). Notice that market prices are a lot more volatile than the level of economic productivity, and yet both sets of data run from the lower-left corner to the upper-right or from less economic productivity and market value to a whole lot more. If we look, we'll find the same basic picture over even longer periods of time and in almost every civil society that is not being impacted by natural disaster or war. Why? Just as ants, termites, and other species have a natural ability to work together for their collective well-being, we humans also have that ability and are further blessed with the natural ability to create and grow complex, organic economic systems (i.e., a synergistic, bottom-up, dynamic system of informal arrangements, as opposed to a top-down command and controlled system, which we can also create, but can easily yield less productive results in a world of constant change). Economic systems tend to foster specialization, property rights (an ability to say "That is mine!"; and because it is mine, I will take care of it — a real economic good), and a willingness to exchange of goods, services and ideas for the mutual benefit of the individual participants. These are all basic human evolutionary traits, as perhaps best told by Matt Ridley in his lucid book "The Rational Optimist" subtitled "How Prosperity Evolves". These are basic moral and economic principles originally compiled and presented as a system by Adam Smith in his first book The Theory of Moral Sentiments and his second (and better known) book ...the Wealth of Nations. These two are no easy read as they were written in old 1700s English. Fortunately for us, Russ Roberts in his book How Adam Smith Can Change Your Life has given us a very readable modern translation of Smith's wisdom on the various ways that we can choose to interact with each other to achieve both prosperity and happiness. Much of Smith's wisdom has been reiterated, clarified, and expanded upon by countless others in their time. A notable example would include Rose & Milton Friedman in their book Free to Choose and the subsequent 1980 Television Series, which had a profound impact on my early personal development. Simply put, we have the natural ability to learn, to cooperate with others for mutual benefit, and to be or get good at doing something and that specialization tends to generate a surplus that we can then trade for everything else we need and want. It's the beauty and benefit of free markets, which are not perfect, far from it, but on balance have done more to lift the average standard of living than any other system known to date. I believe the biggest threat to free markets and the resulting prosperity is the popular utopian concept of inequality is bad and the mistaken belief that government can fix that problem — it cannot, as history has clearly shown. Winston Churchill said, "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessing, and the inherent vice of socialism is the equal sharing of the miseries." We simply have to accept that life will always be unfair and unequal (even identical twins that can start life as equals, never end up as equals, they each grow up and live different lives). There will always be someone else who is richer, better looking, smarter, or just willing to work harder. We will never all be equal. Furthermore, free markets require the acceptance of a meritocracy, where individuals are rewarded for their better ideas, harder or smarter work, and ability to capitalize on available opportunities. Free market prosperity also requires a degree of goodwill and trust that others are not automatically out to prey on us, and all subsequent trade and cooperation depends on a real exchange of integrity, which tends to yield greater opportunity and economic growth in the future, a virtuous cycle for all those willing to engage in this honorable exchange as ultimately guided by consumer (buyer) preferences and producers (sellers) ability to deliver satisfaction. Furthermore, sustainable economic growth is a primary objective of almost every rational consumer and producer because that growth creates wealth and material comfort for them (and everyone else too) as a careful examination of history has also clearly shown. Unfortunately, there will always be some who fail to understand this concept of enlightened self-interest, and thus the need for the rule of law, the police, and the courts (all things that a government can do effectively enough) to handle those individual cases that cannot be properly handled by free market choices.
Assuming no catastrophic change in the world as we know it, we're very likely to see a continuation of this growth pattern as more and more people on this planet seek their version of the American Dream. Investors in a diversified portfolio can expect to earn the market rate of return as the economy continues to grow, which is likely to be about 8% averaged over longer periods of time. There is an understandable connection between economic reality and the market for investable securities issued by businesses and various government entities that we can buy, sell, and hold in a brokerage account. These are securities that allow anyone with investment capital to benefit from this type of economic growth, if we do not pay too much for that participation; and when we do, we'll have to wait for the underlying growth to catch up with the premium paid, which presumes the bits of the economy supporting the value of the security in question can in fact grow in time to generate an appropriate rate of return to justify the higher risk premium. Note that not all business ventures succeed and grow, and that not all business and government issued debt provides the promised rate of return. Alternatively, if we demand too big a discount, we run the risk of not being able to participate at all or find ourselves settling for investments that are on their way to becoming worthless or just worth a whole lot less. All this leads to the one big question facing everyone in the market, "What to buy or sell, and when to do the buying and selling?" Unlike many seasoned investment professionals, fundamental analysis, a prerequisite to rational security selection, especially when considering narrowly focused business ventures, is generally beyond the abilities of the average retail investor. However, there are investment strategies that allow amateur investors to take both direct and indirect advantage of reasonably safe investment opportunities offered by professional money managers that can perform the work required to realize attractive risk-adjusted rates of returns. A direct investment is one that is completely controlled by us. An indirect investment is managed by someone else for a fee, and allows us to take advantage of an investment professional's ability to effectively manage (invest) other people's money. At the simplest level, retail investors can just own [save by simply Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) into] a broad market index fund (e.g., VBINX) that passively earns the market rate of return with one of the lowest costs of participation or a top-quality actively managed fund with a great long-term track record (e.g., VWELX) that offer the opportunity to outperform the market average after paying a higher cost of participation; and both offer the lowest possible investment risk because of the broad diversification, which allows us to bet on almost the whole economic system. There are two big problems with the indirect approach: 1) we'll have to pay these pros a percentage of our wealth to work for us and that can have an amazingly large impact on our ability to grow wealth, and 2) there are natural conflicts of interest — these pros may not always put us (their client's interest) before their own, even if they're required to do so by law. Alternatively, there are direct investment strategies; many are the same as those used by these pros; and some, like the DCA strategy above, exploit natural market volatility. These strategies enable savvy retail investors to earn an even better rate of return than the simple indirect approach because we're earning the percentage paid to the pros in the indirect approach. Furthermore, savvy retail investors may be able to avoid most or at least some of the big losses associated with major economic contractions, but unfortunately these strategies will require effort (preparation and self-discipline) and generally requires more capital too. If you think you've got what it takes, consider the following information that suggests what investors need to know and do to more efficiently manage their own savings to earn an above average rate of return.
Believe it or not, everything that happens on Wall Street begins and ends with the economy; and we need to have a good handle on that. Watch Ray Dalio's How the Economic Machine Works on YouTube. Take a class on macroeconomics (e.g., Kahn Academy's Macroeconomics or Principles of Economics by John B. Taylor, if still available, if not ask me for a copy) and/or reading a book like Ahead of the Curve or A Concise Guide to Macroeconomics or just browse the web. To properly exploit the following information edge, it helps a lot to have a grip on how the economy works and what are the primary data points to monitor.
Leading indicators (like market prices for stocks and bonds) are forward looking and tend to move before the actual economic activity they anticipate. For example, new or a change in standing purchase orders and building permits predict changes in the economy (because they are forward looking) and consistently turn before the economy does, but are not always accurate (e.g., getting a permit to build a home, but that does not always mean that the house will be built, see the list on page 82 in Beating the Business Cycle). Coincident indicators, like GPD and commodity prices, change at approximately the same time as the economic condition they track (e.g., building materials purchased and hours worked to build the house). Lagging indicators follow an event (are backwards looking) and signify completion or something earned (e.g., getting a Certificate of Occupancy for that new home indicates that it is now built and safe to live in or a credit rating update). Click here to learn more about Leading, Lagging and Coincident Indicators.
The chart above is a little busy and it may be hard to see the details. We'll get a better (more current) look at this and other economic and market data via the web links below and in My Weekly Review. In it, I address the Leading, Coincident, and Lagging relationships that I understand. We need to train our mind and eyes to see the data and understand the significance of the market message communicated by that data. This ability to master these relationships between data and investable securities can be worth a fortune as we move through time. Given a set of data that has a strong leading, coincident, and lagging correlation, when you see a leading indicator move up or down, it is just a matter of time until the coincident and then lagging securities do the same. It's one way to buy low and sell high to earn a capital gain with favorable odds of success.
Where can we find useful charts with current Leading, Coincident, & Lagging Indicators? On FRED, the U.S. Federal Reserve Economic Database (FRED). I like the Lewis-Mertens-Stock Weekly Economic Index (LMS) Weekly Economic Index (WEI). It is updated weekly. But it seems to be a hybrid leading & coincident index data, not a true leading, as it is constructed from a composite of both kinds of data. I'm using it as Leading Economic Index (LEI) because it claims to use higher frequency (weekly) samples and because it seems to act like a very good leading indicator.
It is important to look at this data in multiple timeframes. Zoom in (1Y) to see what is happening now, and then zoom out (e.g., to 5Y and then to Max) to see where we are within the bigger picture. Please understand that this data, like all economic data, is subject to revision. It comes out as an initial estimate and is then revised until it becomes a very accurate historic record. So, these data sets have their own version of a leading, coincident, and lagging revision relationship that we can learn to use. It helps a lot to understand the business cycle process (the next section below) and where we are within the big economic picture. Don't focus on just any one reading. See the direction and magnitude of the revisions. Try to also see the trend of the broader data, where we are within the range of historic spread of that data, and how that relates to what is likely happening within the big economic picture (where we are within the boom-bust cycle).Also on Fred, there is the Brave-Butters-Kelley (BBK) data set that is updated monthly. It has a Leading, Coincident, and Lagging Indices, which are now being revised by Indiana University Business Research Center and uploaded into FRED. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has a Composite Leading Indicator (CLI) that has more of a global view. But like BBK above and the Conference Board's LEI, which is not in Fred, these are only updated monthly and are for the prior month. They are at least a month old. (Note that stock companies do quarterly updates; so, their data is at least three months old, but there are lots of sources of information regarding their ongoing operations.) There's an OECD YouTube Video to consider. OECD also offers up a Business Confidence Index (BCI) and Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) on their web page. All of these are good sources of Leading, Coincident, & Lagging Information that can help you better understand where your investment capital is likely to do better in the future.
Another great source of specific economic data is from www.TradingEconomics.com. Refer to The Trader's Guide to Key Economic Indicators for information on how to understand all this economic data. Given that consumption (consumer spending) accounts for about 70% of GDP, many think it is best to focus on economic indicators that track employment, and there is great value in following this data. But the biggest factor affecting employment, investment, and therefore the boom-bust cycles is overall business confidence about the future as indicated by the Purchasing Managers Index, and the costs of doing business. Interest rates (the cost of borrowed capital and the price of bonds), cost of raw material inputs, and labor rates are three big factors affecting the cost of doing business and funding growth opportunities. I think it's good to start with GDP Growth Rates and by extension Productivity, Business Confidence, Consumer Confidence and by extension Employment, and Price Inflation. In my opinion, less important data sets that can also affect GDP growth include Housing and Construction, International Trade, and Government Spending. I say less important because market prices generally move less on these reports. Taxes is the last data set to consider and can greatly impact economic results, but these rates tend not to change that often. The links above take you to a major economic indicator in a set of related indicators. It's advisable to become familiar will all of these economic data sets. When looking at these data, never focus on any one data point (report), as each report is subject to revision and clustering. The economic data tends to be revised a few times after the initial report as more data gets recorded. Furthermore, and like many other aspects of life, economic activity rarely occurs at a smooth and even rate. They tend to cluster (show up in clumps), a feast or famine phenomena. It's not uncommon for activities, sales, and projects to be pulled forward, thanks to economic incentives, and to be pushed out and delayed for many reason, including cash-flow and financing difficulties. Instead, focus on the direction (the broader economic trend) of the data relative to where we are in the business cycle and ask, "Is the overall rate of change economically sustainable (i.e., does it support a continuation of the current economic trend, or does it suggest that a turn is likely in the boom-and-bust cycle)?" Also take a look at related data. Does it support or refute the prior conclusion? Being able to correctly answer this question greatly improves the odds of success. Recall that we want to trade with the health of the broader (economic) trend because that trend is very likely to continue, and an unhealthy trend is likely to reverse or at least correct.
Every weekend, I review the week's economic news, the latest updates and prior revisions, and the associated market price action. I have a process that generates a web page report for that week. I display the latest report on one screen window and the prior report on another. Thus, allowing a side-by-side comparison. Working my way through the report standardizes my analytical process. Seeing and analyzing the changes has been very supportive of my ongoing success. That is, being able to better understand if current prices are likely to be a true or at least reasonable indication of the likely underlying economic grow or current market prices in need of a correction (a reversion to the mean or even the other end of the broader data spread). Note that all market and economic data have a natural tendency (a trend component and a spread component — the range of data points spread around a broader trend average). These are tendencies that we can see, understand, and exploit (i.e., give us a favorable edge when properly applied in the market).
In the long-run, the health of the economy is the most fundamental factor affecting the profitability of almost every business; and by extension, the profitability of securities issued by that business and by related governments. It's not that hard to understand and follow the general health of the economy. First we must understand that the economy naturally goes through boom-and-bust (recovery-and-recession) Business Cycles along the long-term growth trend; and therefore, security prices also cycle through premium and discount values relative to the average underlying fundamental (economic) realities of the businesses that issued those investable securities.
Market price trends lead the current economic trend; that is, traders attempt to anticipate the future. They buy securities they believe are going higher, and sell issues they think should be going lower; and as a result, they adjust current market prices accordingly — adding a premium to bullish prospects and a discount to bearish expectations. Why? If a rationally informed investor owns a security and does not have to sell in a bull market, that investor knows that holding the position is likely to result in future capital appreciation, so a willing buyer has to pay a premium to incentivize the owner to part with some of their likely future gain; and in a bear market a rationally informed owner knows that holding is likely to resulting in a capital loss, so the owner has to accept a discount to induce a willing buyer to take that apparently risky position.
There is a natural positive feedback mechanism between forward looking prices and current economic realities. For example, when market prices are bullish, business owners and managers are naturally more willing to risk capital on projects that can yield growth in future earnings (bigger profit margins), and when these projects are well conceived and implemented, the result often is real earnings growth, and thus advances the current economic uptrend; and when market prices are bearish, owners and managers become defensive and work to protect capital, which tends to retard future growth, which propels the current economic downtrend.
There is a natural problem with forward-looking prices. Current prices can sometimes get too far ahead of economic realities or just get it wrong — economic surprises do happen, which results in price corrections stimulated by scheduled and unscheduled news reports and commentary that do not confirm current market expectations. It's this relationship that explains the paradox of how market prices can both lead and lag economic realities. That is, shorter-term price trends naturally lead by attempting to anticipate the economic news; but when that anticipation is wrong, prices correct to quickly reflect the new perception of the economy.
Big professional money managers understand the relationship between a business's fundamentals and the market's expectation of future value, as expressed by a dynamic range of prices, given all the information that is generally available. These large fund managers (a.k.a., the Smart Money, Whales, and Elephants), in terms of skill they bring to the market and the size of the portfolio they manage; they tend to be some of the very best investors in the market and their multi-million dollar salaries reflect that reality, which is money that is drained from the fund they manage (i.e., the fund's expense ratio). Money naturally flows towards the better operators on Wall Street. These whales have the wherewithal to hire a superior team of analysts and traders. They gather all available information and factor that into a proprietary set of valuation models that indicate a fair-value price range for each security they cover and make a market in by virtue of their willingness to always buy at some discount and sell at some premium. When their position size is small and cash reserve high, they do not have to see much of a discount to become a buyer (referring to the figure "Phases of the Business Cycle" or any longer-term price chart, they buy when prices are below the Long-Term Trendline); but when their position is larger and/or cash reserve is lower, they'll need to see a much bigger discount to resume their buying (Economics 101). They will then patiently hold until prices uptrend and show acceptable profit opportunities. They understand that bull markets ultimately produce periods of overvaluation (excessive premiums — the Peak in the figure) and bear markets generate pessimism and excessive discounting (the Troughs). Their primary objective is to trade with the health of the broader market (economic) trend affecting the value of the securities they specialize in, to be a patient buyer at discount prices, a patient seller at premium prices, and to earn the Market Rate of Return on these securities they hold. (Hum, that sounds like a good strategy for investment success; but how can the retail investor take advantage of this wisdom? — Stay tuned.)
These large professional fund managers have to be patient to avoid creating an enormous supply and demand imbalance that would temporarily push prices to their detriment. Their buying (and selling) can easily drive current prices up (and down) to a price level that cannot be justified by the underlying fundamentals. In fact, every once in a while we'll see a dramatic drop in prices caused by a whale cashing out at any available price to be able to jump into some presumably much better opportunity or to just meet some other sudden need for cash; and as a result of their selling, stimulate others to sell too. There's a bit of a herd mentality on Wall Street, where traders and investors will buy or sell just because others are doing so presuming that others know something they don't. But once all that selling is exhausted (once everyone who could and would sell has done so) prices tend to gradually work (trend) their way back to the prior trading range or a new trading range if the original selling was caused by a real change in the underlying fundamentals. Whenever there exist a supply and demand imbalance (the difference between the current number of shares for sale and that to be purchased), prices naturally adjust to correct that imbalance — excess demand (when the market wants to aggressively buy) causes prices to rise and that brings in savvy sellers who want to take advantage of premium prices and that halts the rise and thus corrects the imbalance; and when supply has the upper hand (the market is aggressively bearish and wants to sell) prices naturally drop to attract buyers who are only willing to buy at discount prices and that halts the drop and corrects the imbalance. These whales prefer to be patient and tend to do their buying and selling using limit orders at favorable prices. We're not very likely to ever get access to their proprietary information and plans; but we can easily see the results of their collective operations (their buying and selling) on a chart as these whales scale (average) in and out of their positions at discount and premium prices.
In the chart above we see that market prices in orange move before (anticipate) the underlying economic boom-bust activity in blue. At the top of that chart, we see the sectors that tend to be in favor at the time, which should confirm the move in the broader index. We can work this via sector ETFs.
Markets are naturally chaotic. Like other chaotic systems, there are apparently random states of disorder and irregularity. From these chaotic systems, we often find emergent systems. Patterns of synergistic behavior that cannot be found in the individual components of the system, just as random air particles can self-organize into weather patterns, like a hurricane. We can use market charts to find and see emergent patterns, patterns that can reoccur at irregular intervals. We may not be able to accurately predict the next occurrence, but we can predict that it will happen sooner or later and when it does, take profitable advantage of it.
Our brains are very good at finding patterns and assigning meaning to the patterns we see. Wall Street lore has identified an amazing number of patterns, and it is often useful to learn about these. But that knowledge is not required, and a foolish reliance on some of these can in fact result in a serious loss of capital, just as livestock can be trained and lead to slaughter. I'll identify some of the standard patterns that are well known and that help me to understand what's happening, to comprehend the Message of the Markets (what forward-looking prices and backward-looking economic data are saying about likely future outcomes). It helps to understand that it doesn't really matter if the patterns we see are real or imaginary or are just self-fulfilling prophecies. Just as in other aspects of life, we need to find and focus on those repetitive patterns that can result in favorable outcomes (pleasure), avoid those patterns (of behaviors) that results in losses (pain), and simply ignored the rest as just so-much-noise and a drain on our valuable time. Let's take a look at some of the standard patterns that I've found to be profitable.
The Markets generates a ton of data every day, and we can train our ourselves to effectively analyze this data to better understand the Message of the Markets. First, we need to understand that the message is basically saying two things: 1) things are likely getting better (trending up) or getting worse (trending down), and 2) the market's collective belief about fair-value prices, which is also known as the current trading range, a Support and Resistance (S/R) Channel (recall our talk about big savvy buyers and sellers stepping in to correct supply and demand imbalances whenever prices are too much of a discount or premium based on their superior analysis). This trading range can also be thought of as a measure of uncertainty about that projected future, a statistical margin of error — the more shorter-term prices deviate away from a sustainable broader market trend, the more likely they are to revert back to that longer-term mean (recall the Statistical Analysis Techniques identified above). Second, we need to develop an ability to not only understand the message, but to also use it to effectively grow the value of our savings (e.g., when Chicken Little is running around saying "The sky is falling.", our best course of action is not to panic, but to study the facts with an open mind and then to take advantage of the best opportunities available at that time; and furthermore, once we realize that the Chicken Littles of the world and their Cheer Leading counterparts on the bull-side have a habit of getting the crowd whipped up and acting irrationally, we can develop a strategy to more effectively deal with these reoccurring patterns, and that's thinking like a professional and a topic for some of the paragraphs below).
One of the very best ways to analyze economic and market data (to understand the message) is to visualize that data, or some aggregation thereof, on a chart over time. Our brains are very good at seeing patterns in the data when presented visually. This is called technical analysis. There are many good books and websites addressing the subject, like The Visual Investor and Chart School. Charts make is easy to spot the market Trend, the first part of the market's message. Charts can also help with the second part of the message, which has two components, Support and Resistance, which creates an S/R Channel, which is a trading range of fair value prices. Support is created by large, well-informed professional value investors taking advantage of discount prices, which exist near the lower end of this channel, and Resistance is created by these same savvy investors taking advantage of premium prices near the top. These Support and Resistance (S/R) levels often look like pivots or waves on a chart [notice the trend reversal patterns (∧ & ∨) in the idealized charts below, these are pivots where the balance of power changes between the bulls and bears]. These pivots are also called peaks and troughs, as seen in the figure above; and the short-term trends into these pivots are called rips and dips. A dip into a trough is a bottoming pivot pattern (∨) on a chart; it's a short-term price trend reversal going from downtrend to uptrend as prices bounce off Support (a short-term market realization of available discount prices, and as a result new bullish buying pressure overpowers the prior excessive bearish selling pressure, and thus creating support and the pivot pattern on a chart). A rip into a peak is a topping pivot pattern (∧) and is a bounce off Resistance (premium prices) where new selling pressure overpowers the prior excessive buying pressure. A primary or broader market uptrend is defined as a pattern of higher pivot highs and higher pivot lows, and a primary downtrend has a pattern of lower pivot lows and lower pivot highs. These pivots in an up or down trend can be referred to as Minor Support and Resistance because in the future we're likely to see support and resistance reoccur in that price range but the odds of that level holding (causing) a primary or broader market trend reversal are relatively low, it would not take much to break that S/R level. We can see examples of Minor S/R pivots in these Up and Down Trend figure. Buy the Dips (buy support in a broader up trend) and Sell the Rips (sell short rallies into resistance in a broader down trend). These trends are likely to continue in the current timeframe until they run into Major Support or Resistance, which is an S/R level that is much more likely to hold and cause a primary trend reversal because a clear majority of traders and investors believe the current trend is overdone, gone too far, and cannot be justified by likely expected economic news and commentary (recall the "Troughs" in the figure above of "Phases of the Business Cycle"). When an uptrend runs into Major Resistance, we're likely to see a classic Head and Shoulders topping reversal pattern (refer to the idealized figure of a Head and Shoulders Top), and when a downtrend runs into Major Support, we're likely to see an Inverse Head and Shoulders. Note that all of these idealized figures are designed to communicate basic technical concepts that can be seen in longer-term charts of the major market indices. But real life is noisy and messy, and these patterns are generally not so clean and clear, especially in real-time and in shorter timeframes. We need to develop the ability to see and trade these technical patterns as they develop because doing so greatly improves our odds of success. Major Support tends to exist at or near the lowest pivots found on daily, weekly and monthly charts and are some of the very best low-risk buying opportunities. Unfortunately, Major Support also tends to have a lot of fear and bearishness associated with it. The best time to buy is on the next higher low on lower volume (the inverse right shoulder). Major Resistance tends to exist at or near the highest pivots found on the same longer-term (monthly, weekly, daily) charts and it is generally best to lock-in some or all of your profits at or before reaching that level (the head). Warning: Major Resistance tends to have a lot of good news and giddiness associated with it, and often prices will fail to make a new higher high on any subsequent good news, just as the last group of buyers jump in. Major Support also occurs when more bad news fails to create a new lower-low, as the last group of sellers panic out at any available price. All this reminds me of the old maxim, "The bulls make money (by going long the uptrend in anticipation of good news) and bears make money (by shorting the downtrend in anticipation of bad news); but pigs and chickens get slaughtered (holding out for even better prices and by buying the good news and selling the bad)!" It is critical that we properly understand both parts of the message of the markets. Most new investors (traders) mistaking focus too much on the first part of the message (the trend), often focusing in on the prior (historic) trend without properly considering that it's the future trend we need to get right, and that requires a greater degree of insight into the fundamental factors driving the broader market trend. Furthermore, most newbie completely ignore the second part of the message (the degree of uncertainty) as expressed by the width of support and resistance channels in longer timeframes, which is just as important as the trend in that timeframe. It's important to understand this two-part message of the market and the associated patterns (in the idealized charts above) exist in multiple timeframes. The big value investors understand that the more prices deviate away from a sustainable broader market trend in the short-run, the more likely they are to correct (be overpowered by bigger forces operating in bigger timeframes).
Prices will naturally trade up and down in a range, called a Support and Resistance (S/R) Channel that reflects the market's collective view of fair-value. Refer to the line chart above which shows an inflation-adjusted cap-weighted composite index of all historic U.S. stock prices. The red arrow line indicates both the direction of the broader market trend and the average price of all this volatility over this extremely long period of time. The two black dashed lines indicate the approximate size of the S/R Channel seen in this timeframe. We should be able to see an S/R Channel like this in every timeframe. As we reduce the size of our timeframe, looking at smaller and quicker intervals of time, we'll see a natural reduction in the size (from top to bottom) of this S/R Channel. Note that the smaller and quicker the S/R Channel the more likely it is for these channels to quickly shift up or down in response to new information. There are many ways that we can draw these channel (trend) lines, and based on those choices, these charts can lead us to different conclusions about what is likely to happen next. It's self-evident that the future tends to resemble the past. Even though life tends to be just variations on a theme with just enough surprises to keep things interesting, there are no guarantees and anything possible can still happen. So, we need a trading and investment strategy that favors us given this economic behavior, like my simple Two-by-Four approach above. These charts can help us to see what is happening now and what has happened in the past. But the further into the future we project our view of this information, the greater the likelihood of a surprise. A good or bad surprise can happen at any time; and these surprises will force us (the market) to reconsider what is known about the past, the present, and therefore the future. It is best to draw these lines like the pros. The pros can still be wrong, but at least we're looking at the data through the same professional perspective. Let's now consider an example Daily chart of the Wilshire 5000 Total U.S. Stock Market Index (refer to that chart). The sample size is one day. Each bar on this daily chart summarizes the trading that occurred on that day. Can you see the S/R Channel? It is unmarked, but we need to train our eyes to see these S/R Channels. Project a set of roughly parallel lines that connect most of the tops and bottom, like in the example chart that has Suport and Resistance labled. The market assumes that premium prices exist near the top of this trading range and that discount prices are near the bottom, based on all the information currently known or believed over the timeframe under consideration. All well-informed investors want to buy low (at discount prices) and to sell high (at premium prices). So the pros try to do their buying and selling just inside the bottom and top ends of this channel. Their goal is to get their orders fill as close to channel edge without missing the next pivot reversal. It's that collective professional activity that creates this trading range. In this context, our goal should be to get some of this price action. But don't worry about getting it perfectly right, the whole trading range, just get some and be a CPT. We could draw in these channel lines and some trading systems do this automatically; but the problem with that is that it encourages us to believe that these lines are fixed, are really there, and that they will always contain all future prices. They are not fixed, are not really there, and they will not contain all future price. History suggests that the bigger and bigger the S/R Channel (trading range), the more and more likely it is to contain most of all future prices, but no S/R Channel will contain all future prices. History also suggests that the more and more prices deviate away from the broader trading range average (S/R Channel mean), the more and more likely they are to return sooner or later; and this is called Reversion to the Mean. Consider the trading around Oct 13 of 2015 on this chart when prices dropped below the green 200-Day Moving Average (MA), which was and is for the majority of time seen on this chart, the relative lower end of the primary S/R Channel seen in this timeframe. I don't recall the news or commentary that caused that break of support and the subsequence sell-off; but clearly there where others who were happy to jump in and take the other side of those trades and the subsequent additional buying pressure overpowered the initial selling pressure and pushed prices back into the prior channel. We see this and variation on this theme all the time. Traders who bought in the channel and then sold on the break, simply locked-in a loss; but those who kept their heads and had a plan to deal with all this, mostly likely locked-in a profit and maintained their CPT status. It's important to understand that these S/R Channels can expand and contract based on overall market confidence. They can also shift up or down as surprising news and commentary hits the market. It helps a lot to have a trading and investment staratgy that has favorable odds in a market with these natural tendencies, like my Simple Two-by-Four Approach above.
Every day, while there is a market venue open for trading, market related trading information (e.g., trading prices and the number of shares traded called volume, and related news and commentary) streams continuously out for all to see and analyze. We can arbitrary summarize all that price and volume data into consumable packets of information that can be shown on a histogram called bar chart. like those seen in this Daily chart. Other example sample sizes include, but are not limited to, 15-minute bars on a 15-minute chart, hourly bars, weekly bars, and even monthly bars on a monthly chart that shows the really big picture. All these timeframes (charts) are simply a statistical aggregation (a standardized summary) of data streaming continuously from the market. That is, we can use our computer systems to take this stream of trading information and break that all down into fixed sample periods called bars, where each bar indicates the high, low, and optionally open and closing prices for that sample period, and that can be displayed on a chart that enables the trained-eye to quickly read the Message of this Market in this Timeframe.
All these sample periods (timeframes) exist simultaneously (i.e., charts within charts and S/R Channels within Channels, a noisy, erratic, quasi-fractal relationship of cycles within cycles). For example, there are four 15-minute periods (bars) in an hourly period (the associated bar seen on the related hourly chart). Also note that larger (bigger) sample periods (as seen on weekly and monthly charts) have bigger price ranges than those seen in smaller (quicker) sample periods or timeframes (like on daily, hourly, and even quicker charts). The shorter the timeframe, the more random the price movements are, a noisy Poisson Distribution, as buy and sell orders hit the market in random clumps creating temporary supply and demand imbalances. In all timeframes there will be visible price trends and S/R levels created (driven) by news and commentary about the economy, the market and related sector indices, and the various securities that comprise the indices, which can all be charted (studied to find divergences in the related data and see Fibonacci Retracements as prices trend between bigger S/R levels and thus define smaller S/R levels). R.N. Elliott was the first to write about this market behavior of cycles within cycles (he called it waves within waves); and Frost and Prechter's book Elliott Wave Principle: A Key to Market Behavior may be the definitive textbook. I can personally see this wave behavior from time-to-time, but I believe the market is just not that well-structured all the time. It is way too easy for some surprising bit of news or commentary to perturb this behavior. But once surprising news or commentary is priced in, we often do see market prices resume a revised version of this Elliott Wave behavior until the next surprise hits the market. The pros understand stuff like this and you can learn about it too and in time you should develop the ability to see cyclical patterns like this too. But you don't have to learn it all to make money. Just learn how to be a CPT and let compounding do the heavy lifting. Of course the more of this technical trading stuff that you can master, the better equipped you'll be to become a CPT in the next quicker timeframe and to enjoy the higher rates of return available to compound in that timeframe.
The shorter the timeframe (e.g., 1-, 5-, & 15-minute charts) the more the price action will be dominated and to some degree manipulated by professional day-traders and their super computers. But the longer the timeframe (e.g., hourly, daily, weekly & monthly charts) the more the price action will be dominated by big value-based fund managers who are focused on the underlying economic realities of the business. That is, the bigger the timeframe the greater the market participation, the bigger the S/R Channel, and the greater tendency of the participants to take a longer-term view of the business, and therefore a better reflection of the likely future value of the securities issued by that business. All big moves naturally start in smaller timeframes, but most pivots seen on shorter timeframes are likely to be minor in nature and the associated trends are likely to reverse just after becoming clear. It's generally best to start with longer timeframes where the patterns (S/R Levels and Trends) are easier to see and more likely to be true (a better indication of the future). It's much easier to become a CPT in longer timeframes, then work to become a CPT in quicker timeframes to realize a better rate of return. But understand the quicker the timeframe the harder is becomes to maintain CPT status because you are trading against better and better trading systems.
The market trend of an S/R Channel (trading range) will attempt to lead (anticipate) the broader economic trend,
as best indicated by the popular 20-, 50-, and 200-period simple
Moving Averages MAs.
These MAs can be thought of as automatic trend lines,
and they naturally smooth out the noise created by shorter-term price volatility.
The 20-period is the short-term trend,
the 50-period is the intermediate-term trend,
and the 200-period MA is the long-term trend line.
Some professional investors also like to include the 100-day MA on their daily chart;
but it is technically the same as the 20-week MA on the weekly chart
(5 trading days in a week times 20 weeks is 100-day MA).
I like to keep it simple and standardized on each chart.
I find the prior three (the 20-, 50- & 200-Period MAs) to be about right in all timeframes and for just about all tickers.
Instead of trying to shove it all into a daily chart,
I find it is best to use multiple timeframe charts (e.g., monthly, weekly, daily, & hourly)
to better see the size of the various trading ranges in each timeframe
and to see the perspective of those professional operating (specializing) in each timeframe.
As prices approach these MAs, we tend to see natural S/R Level stalls and bounces.
Future trend reversals (pivots) are more likely as prices approach an MA that is also at or about the same price level as a prior pivot reversal.
Savvy investors assume that relative premium prices naturally occur above the 200-day MA
and relative discount prices exist below this MA.
They use longer-term MAs to set their trading bias (bullish or bearish).
For example, if prices are trading above the 200-day MA,
they only look for bullish investments opportunities;
and they use a break below this MA as their final stop-loss trade to harvest profits.
Note that many professional traders prefer the 50-period MA;
but like the 20-period, these quicker MAs tend to be too whippy for developing investors.
These pros know that all securities trade around their broader market averages,
as seen in longer-term charts (e.g., monthly, weekly and daily),
when not being driven by specific news;
and that trends in longer timeframes tend to overpower trends in short timeframes.
News and commentary naturally cause corrections and adjustments in these S/R Channels.
The pros use technical analysis to see the broader market trend,
the health of that trend,
and to spot prior support and resistance levels,
which indicates likely, lower-risk,
buy and sell opportunities for limit orders
that facilitate their plans to scale (average) in and out of their positions
as shorter-term S/R channel move up and down within the S/R channels seen in bigger timeframes (longer-term charts).
We can trade and invest like the big professional investors too.
I do my planning to scale in and out based on what I see in the various timeframes.
I try to make capital gains as quickly as I can,
in the quickest S/R Channel timeframe that I can be a CPT.
But when Mr. Market surprises me,
I'm also happy to be paid to wait and to manage my averages as prices shift up and down in bigger timeframes.
So long as my operations are in-sync with health of the broader market trend
(how prices are trading relative to longer-term MAs in longer-term charts),
making an acceptable total return on the current position is just a matter of time and effort.
Feel free to try other MAs on your specific tickers;
but I think it's best to see things the way most professional traders and their computers see things.
If it helps, feel free to include the 100-day MA on just your daily chart.
Bottom line, you want to do more of whatever puts money in your pocket and ignore or avoid things that cost you money;
and never forget that it is easier to realize CPT status in longer timeframes.
Refer to the Candle Stick Chart of the Wilshire 500 Total Stock Market Index (ticker symbol $WLSH, click on the chart to see a current chart). From a broader timeframe perspective, it is in a healthy uptrend, current prices naturally trade above and bounce off or near the popular 20-, 50-, and 200-period MAs as they advance in anticipation of changes in the underlying economics. In a healthy up trend, it is common to see slightly higher (above average) volume on the advancing bars and slightly lower volume on the counter-trend bars. It also common to see much bigger volume on major trend reversals (e.g., Sep 19 & Dec 19, 2014). When prices get too far away from these MAs, the trend becomes less healthy, looses steam, and generally put in a quick counter-trend pull-back to test support off a rising MAs before resuming the primary uptrend. A healthy uptrend has a pattern of higher pivot highs and higher pivot lows, and tends to have current prices trading at or a little above these MAs; and a healthy downtrend has a pattern of lower pivot highs and lower pivot lows, and tends to have current prices trading at or a little below these MAs. This example chart has all the major pivots marked with their relative high or lows prices. The primary trend become less healthy and more likely to reverse as prices and the 20- and 50-period MAs get spread-out vertically (e.g., Nov 24), and is very unhealthy when we see near-vertical price action on much bigger than average volume (e.g., the week of Oct 13). By adding RSI and MACD technical indicators to our chart, we're better equipped to see the health of the trend as it gains and loses momentum, to see when prices are overbought (e.g., RSI in the week of Nov 24) and oversold (e.g., RSI in the weeks of Oct 13 & Dec 15), and to spot unhealthy Divergences (we'll take a closer look at these last three technical topics in context below, and but it might be best to first consider the excellent, free, professional instruction offer by StockCharts.com — as my old Prop Trading Mentor use to say, "You don't want to show up to a professional gun fight with just a pocket knife.", ideally we want to be able to read charts like the pros). These healthy and unhealthy patterns can be seen in just about any other chart or timeframe, and we need to learn how to spot them and how to play them (i.e., we need to learn how to improve our odds of success).
One of the first things new traders are told or they eventually learn the hard way, "The trend is your friend." and "The easiest way to make money is to trade in the direction of the broader market trend." and all this trend trading naturally powers the current trend forward. But human nature being what it is, it doesn't take much for short-term traders to push the current trend to an unrealistic extreme (i.e., the rate of change in prices cannot be justified by any sustainable rate of change in the business that issued the security or the broader economy). Whenever current prices and the 3 popular MAs get spread out vertically on a chart, prices a subject to correction (e.g., in late Nov. of 2014 and then again a month later, prices correct to test support near the rising 200-Day MA). A large and mature economy like in the U.S. seems to be able to grow at a slow and steady rate of something like 1 to 4% annually and can do this for a very, very long time; but growth rates at much above 5% or when growth accelerates too quickly, create natural economic imbalances and instabilities (this is actually true for any rapid rate of change, recall the old adage "How to boil a frog."). At best, these instabilities can lead to diminishing rates of return or at worst can cause an economic crash, like in 2008. Whenever prices move too far and then fail to move future on more good or bad news, the trend is likely to reverse. The market will always find some reason to justify a normal correction (a sharp pull-back toward an MA, as repeatedly seen in the chart above or in just about any other chart using these professional settings); and when prices get way too far ahead of the fundamentals, we're very likely to see a primary trend reversal and that trend will likely continue until it too becomes overdone. The easy money is made trading with a healthy broader market trend and the big money can be made trading against an unhealthy trend. But this later trick requires real skill to pull off and can be very costly when done with too much capital in the learning phase, but it's a professional-level skill that is well worth the time and appropriate capital control to develop.
The health of the Broader Market Trend is indicated by the price pivot patterns
relative to the popular 20-, 50-, 100- & 200-period
Simple Moving Averages
(SMAs or just MAs), volume, and a momentum oscillator (like RSI or MACD) on the monthly, weekly, daily, and hourly charts
(refer to the CandleStick Chart of the Wilshire 500 above
or any longer-term chart using these MAs, and with industry standard settings for Volume, RSI and MACD as seen in the chart above).
Also, on longer-term charts, like monthly, weekly and daily,
use logarithmic price scaling
and all intraday charts use arithmetic (linear) scaling.
A healthy trend has:
An unhealthy trend has one or more of the following:
Classical technical analysis says, "Favor the longer-term trend over the shorter-term." and that's why we should always start with longer-term charts first, but all long-term changes start in the shorter-term; so, we must figure out which applies now (i.e., "Is the latest short-term move the beginning of a major turn or just so-much-noise?"). The best way to answer this question is to consider the health of the broader trend because when that trend becomes unhealthy it becomes more likely that a stronger shorter-term trend will be able to create a primary turn in the broader trend.
Read Technical Analysis 101 on StockCharts.com, and look at as many charts as you can. View each ticker on your Watch-List in multiple timeframes (e.g., on weekly, daily & hourly charts). See how these charts evolve over time. Initially you we see a lot of CRAP. But in time your brain will surely develop the ability to see these favorable patterns, to understand the Message of the Markets — the broader market trend, the health of that trend, and the trading range in each timeframe. CRAP tends to be more common in shorter timeframes when there is a lack of economic news and the markets are dominated by professional day-traders. When you see CRAP, always refer to the next longer (bigger) timeframe. If there's a favorable trade in the current market, that's where we'll find it; but it may require some patience to wait for a favorable entry or for a near-term entry to reach a favorable exit. Patience is one of an investors greats assets (i.e., having an ability to wait for Mr. Market to deliver favorable prices), and is the key to mastering Rule 3 of my Simple Two-by-Four Approach.
Let's review the three classic trend trading patterns below. These are all promoted by Wall Street Talking Heads, talk that's designed to get us and keep us trading. Every time we make a trade, Wall Street gets to feed on our account thanks to trade commissions, fees and slippage. Let me also point out that learning how to profitably do the following in quicker intraday and daily chart timeframes is very difficult; but not so hard in slower timeframes, like on a monthly and weekly.
All three of these popular trading strategies are much easier said than done, especially in shorter timeframes; however, it's generically not too hard to learn how to play (consistently profit from) the first two when applied to longer timeframes (i.e., convert these trades into more of an investment strategy). Note that number three above (the breakout or breakdown trade) becomes a number one (a trend trade), when the break is real (i.e., is fundamentally well founded), and we enter on the first pull-back (e.g., buy the dip). Learn how to master the first two trading strategies above in longer timeframes, and then try to reproduce CPT results in slightly quicker timeframes because rate of return is a function of time with better rates occurring in quicker timeframes, which is a primary reason why most try shorter timeframes first, a classic beginner mistake. To better understand technical analysis and the professional trader's perspective, consider taking Corey Halliday's Start Trading Socks Using Technical Analysis, Parts 1 & 2, and Advanced Technical Analysis, Parts 1 & 2 offered on Udemy.com.
If you find yourself losing too much of your capital trying to trade these simple patterns, it is very likely due to one or more of the following reasons:
Only an Idiot would seriously expect to beat a professional short-term trader at their own game on their home court. Don't be a Trading Idiot. Please understand that very few will ever develop the skill needed to effectively grow the size of their brokerage account as a short-term trend trader (i.e., an ability to effectively play the Winner's Game). That's the bad news, and one of Wall Street's dirty little secrets. Most professional day-traders make their livings by specializing in just one security or a small number of similar securities and by mastering just one strategy or a few variations on that strategy, which enables them to out-trade most retail wannabes most of the time and by legally front-running the Elephants. Their chart reading abilities allow them to see what the big fund managers are buying and selling, and they get in front of that short-term trend. They also know how to plant or exploit news and commentary in the popular media. Learning to succeed as a day-trader requires a very specialized set of tools and talents, and very few will ever be able to enjoy the amazing proceeds over time because it's probably the most competitive arena open to lions, lambs and jackals alike.
But wait, there's good news too! An investor (a longer-term trend trader) who understands the information presented in this paper can grow their wealth in the markets, by first learning to invest with the big (smart) money (to trade with the Elephants) by focusing the bulk of our time and capital on large, mature funds managed by these Elephants (and that gives us a real hold option, which allows us to avoid all or almost all of these little trading stop-losses while avoiding most big mistakes); and then learn to trade against these Elephants (learn how to use charts to see where these Elephants are doing their buying and selling), who are just too big and slow to compete against smaller traders using the same tactics (small traders can generally get in and out quickly without impacting market prices).
Most professional traders are paid to trade, and they have to trade every day. You do not. Some days are better than others (i.e., some days have a clear trend and other days are just CRAP). They have to trade every day; and their trading and tactics can sometimes move prices to ridiculous extremes in that timeframe. As a retail investor, we can wait for trading opportunities that favor our growth. Let's the pros beat each other up and just wait for them to bring favorable prices and trends. Only make a trade when doing so puts the odds of success in our favor.
First learn how to keep your operations in-sync with broader economic trend, the boom-bust business cycle. Learn to exploit the natural benefits of Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) a mutual fund (an example of a survivable investment), which does not always require a stop-loss when the short-term trend turns against your position (i.e., when a quick break of the entry level occurs). In fact, we can use that counter trend move to improve our odds of success by reducing our cost-basis (the average price per share, which is also the break-even price of the investment). DCA works because it tends to generate a cost-basis that is below the average price seen in the trading range (the S/R Channel) over longer holding periods, which makes it much easier to harvest a profitable investment in a future cyclical upturn. Warning: Only do this with securities that are very likely to survive the business cycle. Survivable securities are issued (backed) by large, mature businesses (that have been operating for at least a decade and the ticker can fill a monthly chart), enjoy a naturally diverse asset allocation and/or a geographically diversified revenue stream, are run by seasoned managers with a high degree of integrity, have a viable business models going well into the foreseeable future, and they operate under western (GAAP) accounting and legal standards. Once again, large, mature mutual funds are an excellent example of a survivable investment.
Over shorter periods of time, the size of the economic pie is pretty much fixed and short-term traders have to fight over the pieces, and market functionaries will feed off both the winners and losers alike; but over longer periods of time, the size the pie can and will grow, easily overcoming transactions costs and market inefficiencies, and that's where the slow and easy money will be made by patient investors who hold survivable claims against that bigger pie. To grow your account as a short-term trader, you not only have to be better than average, you have to be far better than average to also overcome transactions costs, market inefficiencies, plus the cost of a competitive trading system and high-speed information, which can add up to a considerable sum of money that can easily exceed a thousand dollars a month. Successful short-term traders have to be able to win the winners game and be able to bear the associated costs until they reach that level of performance, if ever. But let's not curse these professional short-term traders. They are actually a savvy investor's unwitting prey. Because they are natural trend traders and they will, sooner or later, push the current trend to ridiculous (cyclical) extremes. They also provide the liquidity we need (they're almost always willing to take the other side of our trade). It's these two endearing qualities that make it easy for a patient investor to get in and out at favorable prices (near primary trend reversals at major support and resistance levels). It's all about learning how to take advantage of Mr. Market's foolishness.
A Bull Market in stocks begins before the Economic Cycle bottoms out (refer to the idealized diagram Sector Rotation Model, which identifies the market sectors that tend to do best in the various phases of the business cycle). Notice that the stock market (the red cycle) bottoms well before the economy (the green cycle) bottoms out, while going into Full Recession. This is because the market is, once again, forward looking and the economic data is backwards looking.
Bull markets are born in despair, grow amid skepticism, mature in optimism, and die amid euphoria. — True market wisdom from Sir John Templeton.
These business cycle trends are very long lived, often running for years; this is because of a positive feed-back mechanism that powers the current trend forward until it is clearly overdone, and even though the data is backwards looking, knowledge of the current economic trend and this cyclical relationship can still be a profitable guide to the mostly likely future market trend. Wise portfolio managers keep their operations (long or short) in-sync with the health of the broadest market (economic) trend, and when that trend turns against their position they close or a least greatly reduce the size of that position, understanding that a relatively small stop-loss now is far superior to a slow longer-term reduction of wealth and thus frees up buying power to invest in more productive prospects.
Economically sensitive securities, like stocks (e.g. VTI) and corporate bonds (VCIT), do best in times of economic expansion (Early Recovery); and the best time to start these positions is in Full Recession. Start buying (averaging into) economically sensitive issues when the economy looks completely busted. This is when these securities are ready to move up in prices because weaker businesses have already gone out of business, survivors are taking market share, and interest rates have already come down and have stabilized at or near longer-term lows, and all this is good for surviving businesses going forward. From a technical (chart) perspective, this is when prices fail to go down on new bad news. Once the economy starts to recover, reduce the size and duration (average time to maturity) of portfolio bond exposure before interest rates start to rise (a rise in interest rates means a drop in bond prices and the value of bond funds — the worst time to be in bond funds is just before rates start to rise because prices will drop). Investing in shorter duration tenors (similar debt securities with the same length of time to maturity) will drop less while still paying the advertised yield and providing a hedge against surprises. The term tenor describes the length of time remaining in the life of a financial contract This is a time to "buy (stocks in) the dips and to sell (into) the rips" or simply just be long stocks (especially in taxable accounts) until the market shows signs of topping out.
Assuming no catastrophic major economic event or a string of significant minor events, the stock market will naturally top out after interest rates have risen to near longer-term highs to better compete with stock returns, to cool off an unsustainable rate of growth, and excess inflation. At an economic top, the economy is reaching full or near full production, and resources (like labor and commodities) will have become scares and expensive. Recall that market prices are anticipatory (forward looking), so market prices will top-out before the economy tops-out; but there will be times when the market incorrectly signals a top. At a real top, news of great stock market returns will lead popular media reports, money market funds will be paying nice yields (e.g., better than 3%), and businesses will be reporting their Best News Ever. But stock prices will be unable to put in new higher-high. We'll see a Head and Shoulders topping pattern on longer-term charts. On new good news, prices will open up in the morning, but will close near the day's low. This is because big professional investors are now selling stocks to the last group of retail investors, who are finally convinced that it is now safe to get in; and we're all starting to think, "Making money in the stock market is easy!" and "Maybe I can do this for a living." At a stock market top we're likely to see an inverted yield curve, which indicates trouble ahead. An inverted yield curve is always preceded by a flat yield curve But not every flat curve results in an inverted curve. Let's that flat curve be your warning signal, especially when market prices fail to make a new higher-high on more good news.
The U.S. Treasury yield curve is the interest rate structure running from short-term bills, through intermediate-term notes to longer-term bonds of similar quality debt, like U.S. Treasuries. Normally, shorter-term debt has lower rates relative to longer-term debt because the longer the time to maturity the greater the risks associated with that type of investment, and therefore the higher the rates need to be to attract new investors. [By-The-Way: The term "Tenor" is often seen when looking at the market for debt securities. It refers to a specific class of debt securities in their time to maturity (e.g., a batch of new U.S. 10-Year Treasury Notes at issue have a tenor of 10; but after 5 years, those notes will have a tenor of 5, the same as a batch of new 5-Year Notes). Tenor is an easy way to identify an identical set of securities when looking up a price quote.] Inversion (often referred to as the "2-10 Spread") is caused by the government pushing up short-term rates to cool of economic growth and big professional investors rotating out of stocks (harvesting profits) and averaging into longer-term government bonds (buying bonds bids up the prices, which pushes down yields). When we see this inversion, we want to Swim with these whales (trade like these big savvy professional investors) — it's best to harvest our long-term stock gains (average out) and start buying (averaging into) top-quality government or agency bonds or bond funds in the intermediate range (5-, 7- and 10-year notes). Try not to worry about selling the perfect shorter-term top in stocks and buying the perfect near-term bottom in longer-term bonds, that is an almost impossible task. There's an old saying, "Price take the escalator up and the elevator down." Once it's clear the top is in, everyone will want out and that's when prices drop like a rock. Try not to be in that crowd. You simply want to be in-sync with the bigger, longer-term boom-bust cycle, just like the big guys.
A Normal Yield Curve (e.g., August 14, 2002, which is the red line on the blue-white chart shown to the right next to the associated stock chart of the S&P 500) rises from 3-Months Bills (3M on the very bottom left of the x-axis or time scale of the chart) to 30-Years Bonds (30Y on the bottom right) and is generally good for both stocks and corporate bonds. Note that StockCharts.com, which generated these charts, identifies the shape of the curve in the lower right corner of the chart (in this case "Normal"). This normal yield curve indicates that as time to maturity is added to the debt, so is the cost of that debt (the interest rate shown on the y-axis). | |
A Flat Yield Curve (5Y to 20Y; e.g., Jan. `00; a.k.a., a Humped Curve) is not good for stocks nor corp. bonds, and prices tend to base out and down, and are often very choppy. This is a good time to harvest profits and generally raise cash because every Inverted Curve becomes Flat first, but not every Flat Curve becomes Inverted. | |
An Inverted Yield Curve (short rates are higher than long rates, e.g., Aug. 2, 2000) is bad for stocks and good for government bonds, and signals the start of a new bust cycle (a bear market in stocks). An Inverted Curve often leads the next downturn by 6 to 12 months, depending on how strong the economy is running. A strong economy will take time to cool off, but a weak system can quickly fall off a cliff as investors dump their stocks and flock to the safety of government bonds. Note that banks and other lenders fundamentally make money by borrowing short and lending long. This means that they take in deposits that earn a relatively small yield (checking, savings and money market accounts, and most CDs are all examples of shorter-term bank borrowing) and they lend money at higher (market) yields for longer periods of time and they earn the difference, which is called the spread. As the yield curve flattens and then inverts, leaners lose this ability to earn the spread. So easy money dries up, and the economic fire is starved of fuel. |
The credit cycle boom and bust factor needs to be considered. When money is cheep (rates are low) businesses often find it easier to justify growth projects and acquisitions, expecting new sales revenue to cover the cost of the debit while yielding an attractive rate of return for taking on the risk. If all goes as expected, there is real economic growth and value creation; but if the expected sales do not show up as expected or an economic downturn is sooner and/or deeper than expected, the excess debt can cause a firm to file for bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is always bad for bond holder, as they lose all future interest payments and only get back pennies on the dollar; and is almost always (~99% of the time) deadly for stock holders that hold out for a White Knight, which is often talked about, but almost never shows up until the assets are being sold to pay the debt holders. When a firm declares bankruptcy, it's almost always best to sell sooner than later to avoid further losses; the investment has already gone bad, don't wait to see it go from bad to worse. Note when one firm in an industry group declares bankruptcy, the market will often sell every firm in that group, which can be an opportunity to buy the best of bread at discount prices, which is likely to survive (if they do not have too much debt) and take sales (market share) from the bankrupt company. Beware of securities backed by companies with excessive debt loads (i.e., Debt-to-Equity Ratio greater than average for the industry group in that part of the boom-bust credit cycle). It's best to avoid young, smaller companies because they may not have what it takes to survive this cycle. It's best to own these through mutual funds.
Fundamentally speaking, bear markets are caused by RSVP — Recessions, Shocks, (excessive) Valuations, and (stupid) Policies.
Technically speaking (chart analysis),
minor trend reversal tend to happen when RSI
is overbought or oversold and,
a primary (major) trend reversal is likely when chart indicators
(like RSI and
MACD)
are showing divergences.
Even though prices are making a pattern of higher-highs and higher-lows in an uptrend
(refer to the idealized Up Trend figure above),
these technical indicators (RSI and/or MACD) are not, thus signaling a loss of momentum.
The market for the security being analyzed is losing buying power,
few are left to drive prices even higher,
and prices will fail to move up on good news
because large savvy fund managers (the Whales) are selling and thus creating major resistance.
This is when prices actually do fail to make a new higher-high
(refer to the idealized Head and Shoulders Top figure above).
It is a time to seriously reduce the size of economically sensitive positions
(stocks and corporate bonds).
In fact, it's good to start averaging out when we see the divergences on longer-term charts.
It's always best to sell when we can and not when we have to.
Try to be out well before prices establish the first lower-low.
Trying to sell the top is a fool's errand.
Once it becomes clear to the market that the primary trend is turning (or worse has turned),
there will be a race to the exit and that will propel the new downtrend forward.
There will likely be an initial fading of the new selling surge as a few die-hard longs try to take advantage of new lower prices
(thinking that they can still buy the dips),
thus creating the next lower-high (the right shoulder) and thus signally a new bear market trend.
In the subsequent bear market
(refer to the idealized Down Trend figure above),
every new lower-high is an opportunity to sell (short) economically sensitive issues like index ETFs
(and to cover those shorts in the next or some future dip, a lower-low).
In a bear market, it is the time to own top-quality defensive issues,
like government bonds (e.g., VGIT) and maybe
XLP & XLU,
which do relatively better in times of economic contraction.
Bear markets tend to end with a near-vertical downward price move on above average volume followed by a snap reversal back up, a classic
Inverse Head and Shoulders pattern.
This pattern is created by amateurs selling their longs because they're afraid of losing everything (panic selling),
longs on margin
are forced to sell by their broker to avoid losing more than the value of their account,
and professionals are selling short to ride the downtrend down.
It's all this selling that causes the high-volume near-vertical price action.
But at some point, the selling will become exhausted (everyone who has to sell or wants to sell will have already done so) and the vertical price movement will start to slow down;
and it's at this point that the big savvy traders start to pile in on the long side (creating major support) and that forces the shorts to cover (more buying).
It's all this new buying that causes the new primary uptrend to be created, often leaving a bottoming tail after three or more red (down) bars on the chart
(refer to the figure of a bottoming tail after a number of red bars and a topping tail after a number of green up bars).
This paragraph has been very technical, a bit idealistic, but nonetheless, a description of what actually happens time and time again!
Another one of Wall Street's dirty little secrets.
Now that you understand what happens and why,
learn how to see these patterns in real charts.
Unfortunately, real life and real charts are messy (very noisy).
Understand that your broker will not allow you to trade the middle of the chart.
You have to trade the hard-right-edge as real-time trades create historic price patterns,
which mean you have to develop an ability to see these patterns as they are being created,
and to have a plan for what you'll do if the pattern runs its likely course and
for what you'll do if the pattern fails to develop.
It is this ability that separates the pros from most other market participants;
but nonetheless, a valuable trading skill that can be developed by armatures with a fair amount of self-discipline, perpetration and practice.
Just as there are broad economic business cycles, there are a number of smaller (quicker) market cycles that re-occur with amazing predictability because they are cycles driven by the calendar. Here are a few examples:
Many companies pay a dividend and the bigger the dividend the more likely we are to see an exploitable cyclical swing, assuming that no other news is driving the price action. For example, there are a number of mature high-yielding blue-chip stocks (like Dow Components: AEP, CSCO, CVX, DD, FE, GE, HD, INTC, JPM, PG, PFE, SO, T, UPS, & XOM) that naturally cycle through their intermediate term Support and Resistance Channel every quarter. Prices tend to rally a week or so before a stock goes Ex-Dividend (or just Ex-Div — begins trading without the latest dividend payment, meaning that the money that was on the books of the business as an assets is now a liability). On the open of the Ex-Div date the stock will generally gap-down (drop down on the open relative to the prior closing price) by the amount of the dividend and will often sell-off for a few days after that. Furthermore and much to my amazement, there's another repeating pattern associated with these cash payments. Stocks that pay big dividends also tend to rally on the pay dates, as if may investors suddenly see new money in their account, they track down the source, realizing that they just got paid to hold a stock then use whatever cash they have (like that dividend payment) to buy more of (reinvest in) that very stock. Warning: The most important thing to understand about dividends is the payout ratio. A good business is basically a profitable business, and the dividend should be a reasonable (sustainable) percentage of the bottom line profits (a.k.a., Net Income) given to the owners of that business. Beware of high payout ratios (e.g., above 75%) as these are subject to being cut in cyclical downturns, which could cut a stock's price in half on the day of the announcement. Notable Exceptions to the Warning: Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), Closed-End Fund (CEF), Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), and Business Development Companies (BDCs) are all Regulated Investment Companies (RICs), which are basically publicly traded businesses (stocks) that are in the business of investing other people's money and have to pay out at least 90% of all income earned to avoid paying corporate income tax — their profits flow to the owners who have to pay the tax bill.
As a general rule, large, mature ETFs are great examples of naturally survivable investments; but there's a fly in this ointment. ETFs are pro-cyclical. When they are in favor, traders and investors buy the ETF and that extra buying pressure tends to create a spread between the price of the fund and the NAV of the fund (the actual Cash Value of the underlying investments in the fund), meaning that there is an arbitration opportunity — Whenever two things that should have the same value, but don't for one reason or another, big money managers can buy the cheaper of the two and sell the more expensive until the two are equal again. It's easy money for large money manager that have very low trading cost and also have an arbitration arrangement with the fund managers. This is why ETF NAVs track the underlying cash value so closely. When an ETF is popular, money naturally flows into the group or sector of that the fund is focused on and that uptrend causes even more money to flow in until it's clearly overdone. The opposite is true on the bear side. Meaning that retail investor need to avoid the natural temptation to buy a big winner (a fund that has already had a big move up) and sell after a big move down (if the group or sector has a future, meaning that whatever good or service they produce will still be consumed in the future, it will come back into favor sooner-or-later). Note that traditional open-end funds are also pro-cyclical (but they do not have the same arbitration mechanism); however, buying a 5-star funds just forces the fund managers to buy high and in time sell low. Closed-end fund are not as naturally pro-cyclical; but because of their high-distribution yield, they have a natural tendency to lose value when purchased after favorable mention (click here to learn how I invest in these — simply put, only buy CEFs when they are out of favor and sell when you've realized an above average total rate of return).
The quarterly earnings reports is another calendar cycle that is easy to master. Companies report their earnings on an annual and quarterly basis and this drives another amazingly predictable pattern of behavior that can be exploited by savvy investors known as Earning Season and Warning Season, where the first tends to be bullish and the later tends to be bearish. Earnings Season begins in about the second week after the end of the prior quarter when (unofficially) Alcoa (ticker AA) reports after the market close. Assuming no other news is driving the action, prices tend to be bullish and will often rallying into the actual earnings report in anticipation of better than expected news and guidance. Actually, the move is driven by the old adage, "Buy the rumor and sell the news." After the report, prices tend to sell-off because most companies just barely beat the market's expectations. The most import part of any earnings report is the forward looking guidance, which can be much better than or worse than expected and that can create a new price trend, either up or down respectfully, which can often start by a big gapping move up or down (respectfully) that is filled (a quick counter trend move that often fills the gap just created) before resuming in the initial direction. Warning Season, the other part of this quarterly cycle, is the last two weeks of the quarter up through the beginning of Earnings Season and (as indicated above) tends to be bearish. It is very easy for the bears to push prices down because of the lack of bullish news and the suspension of normal corporate buybacks. Most investors will forgive a missed good news warning, but the lawyers are quick to file suites when a bad news warning is missed. Furthermore, businesses tend to be in quiet mode as they preparing to report their numbers as they do not want to be accused of unfairly disclosing material information (Reg. FD requires fair disclosure).
The other category of calendar cycles is driven by periodically schedule economic reports and industry conferences. Click here to see the current calendar of scheduled economic reports. As for all the various industry conferences, let me say: 1) The few that I've studied tend to rally before the conference, jump around based on the news, and then sell-off as the hot money moves on the next thing making news; and 2) it's best to learn about these by learning more about a few specific blue-chips that you like and understand.
To learn more about all these quicker cyclical patterns, refer to The Little Book of Stock Market Cycles and/or The Almanac Investor, both by Jeffrey Hirsch. The pros know about these calendar patterns, they do their part to create and perpetuate them, and we can learn to exploit these too. We can easily see these cycles on weekly, daily, and on hourly charts (it pays to always see the market in these three timeframes) as prices trade up and down through the various S/R levels (based on prior pivots) and the various price trends seen in each chart timeframe. Notice how the various issues tend to trend up into the scheduled event and then sell-off after the event, when no specific bearish mood is leading the popular news.
Another type of market cycle to be aware is driven by the relationship among various parts of the economy. There are market group and sector cycles that have leading and lagging relationships, just like the stock market and the economy. It's beyond the scope of this paper to address all the various relationships here, but reading Intermarket Analysis: Profiting from Global Market Relationships by John J. Murphy and/or Intermarket Analysis and Investing: Integrating Economic, Fundamental, and Technical Trends by Michael E.S. Gayed is time and money very well spent. (Note that all the books listed in the paper are required reading to become a true professional portfolio manager (i.e., be able to effectively invest large sums of other people's money), but I'm not convinced you have to study them to earn an above average rate of return on a much smaller retirement fund — consider this insight that was given to me by an old pro I was fortunate enough to talk with many years ago, "I can't always tell you which stock or group will go into or out of favor next, but I can sure tell you that, if they can survive the vagaries of the market (think most big mature blue chips), they will all go in and out of favor, and the major support and resistance cycle swing seen on longer-term charts is a very exploitable trading pattern."
And there's yet one more type of cycle that prices tend to work their way through — periods of low volatility (relative tranquility) as prices grind higher and high volatility (major uncertainty). There's another old saying that applies here, "Stocks (or whatever) take the escalator up and the elevator down." Recall that prices naturally trade in a range (a support and resistance channel) that reflects the market's collective view of fair value looking forward. There will be times when the market is able to talk itself into thinking that we have relative clarity, a good handle on what's likely to happen; and when this is the case, prices wiggle and giggle in a relatively narrow range as P/Es tend to expand and cause prices to drift higher, a risk-on environment. But then something unexpected happens and everything we thought we knew is called into question; and prices start to jump around and are no longer trapped in a narrow range (the S/R Channel expands, mainly because Support drops). In times of perceived uncertainty savvy investors need a bigger discount to motivate them to take on more risk and the whole market is suddenly willing to take a lower premium to lock in a profit, and all this causes P/Es to contract and price feel heavy (want to go down). After a, generally extended, period without new surprises the market gets comfortable with the New Normal and volatility contracts into a new period of tranquility and economic expansion.
Retail investors can actually earn an above average sustainable rate of return without too much effort when they realize that the economy naturally goes though boom-and-bust business cycles; and so do market prices, in a noisy, erratic, quasi-fractal pattern of market cycles leading economic cycles, and of trading range cycles within cycles (larger cycles in Monthly Charts, slightly quicker and smaller cycles in Weekly Charts, and much quicker and even smaller cycles in Daily Charts, etc.). Like the pros, we can learn some of these cyclical patterns and that's gives us a statistical edge that we can exploit. But even when the pattern breaks (i.e., does not go as we expect), we can still make money by just focusing the bulk of their time and capital on a few tax-efficient, different (market sector) funds run by big, mature fund companies that track the market as various groups and sectors cycle in and out of favor (i.e., trade in a longer-term S/R Channel — just be a buyer near cyclical lows and a seller near cyclical highs as seen on longer-term monthly, weekly, and daily charts). Once this feat is mastered, investors can possibly do even better by selecting slightly more volatile issues that payout higher yields and by working with weekly, daily and hourly charts, but this will require a lot more time, effort and self-discipline (i.e., successfully applied investment wisdom).
Successful investing is anticipating the anticipations of others. — John Maynard Keynes.
We can use basic investment and economic wisdom (like that introduced above and found in books like A Random Walk Down Wall Street and The Investor's Manifesto), current economic data and applied technical analysis to become better anticipators and in time raise the capital base we'll need to live on in retirement. All successful investment strategies revolve around the following principles, which yield the benefits of Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) and Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) (you don't have to learn MPT & CAPM to enjoy the benefits of this Nobel Prize winning financial wisdom, just learn how to apply the following principles):
All we need to do is, Go with the flow (trade with the broader market trend) and take advantage of favorable prices (trade against deviations away from that broader market trend). Own a few dissimilar investments that are very likely to survive and that will pay us to hold. Use charts to see what the market is doing now and a spreadsheet to track investment details, and use both to plan out alternative possibilities, over-and-over again. In time, the process will become second nature, a deeply ingrained habit, that can be fine-tuned as needed. It will be like mindlessly turning the crank on a money machine.
Try not to worry about money left on the table. Capturing every last penny possible is an impossible objective and can only leads to frustration and costly over trading. Nobody gets to consistently earn all that the market can yield. It is impossible to consistently buy the lows and sell the highs, and it's a fool's errand to obsess on that goal. Understand that stocks will trade up and down all the time, and the first thing we need to master is becoming a CPT, an objective that is really not that hard to achieve in longer timeframes. Nothing favors the growth of an account like compounding a string of relatively high-yielding profits. Note that the market can easily generate a positive or negative 10% or bigger yield over relatively short periods of time. Whenever the market gives you a better than 10% rate of return, take it, and allow a string of these to compound. And when the market shows you a drawdown, like a 10% or whatever paper loss, work to overcome that or at least wait for Mr. Market change his mind and show you an acceptable profit. Note that this approach to buying when stocks are out of favor means that we might have to wait, maybe even a long, while before seeing a price recovery, which is why we need to focus on a few dissimilar, survivable investments, that will pay us to hold. Be patient, this type of investment will recovery and show a profit in due time. We simply do now want to take a loss that can show is a profit sooner or later. Even a string of low positive yields can cause a growth curve to turn up. So, we need find and only take trades that are very likely to yield a profit sooner or later, which means we need to patiently and wait for Mr. Market to show us favorable prices, and to book those profits when we realize them. When starting out, we must harvest profits whenever the market offers up an acceptable return relative to the current trading range and market environment, thus supporting our CPT status. It's a status that can be easily obtained when the proceeding information is applied to longer timeframes with an appropriate trading and investing methodology.
It helps, a lot, to be able to find and exploit favorable trading opportunities. But mastering market times is not easy. However, it can be done in time and with appropriate effort, and by using a repeatable methodology. Another skill that can easily be mastered and that can greatly improve results is to use a spreadsheet to track portfolio position P&Ls details (all trading entry and exit details, and all income and expenses to show real-time position P&Ls), so that we can know if we have an acceptable total return profit to harvest in the face expected bearishness looking forward. Most (all that I've seen) brokerage system are pretty good at tracking your capital P&L profile; but I've yet to find one that also tracks all your income and expense details associated with that position. We have to track these total return details. Doing this allows us to see the effect of income earned while holding, which has a significant impact on total return; and by tracking commissions and fees we're better able to see the hurdle that must be overcome just to reach break-even. Furthermore, by doing this ourselves we're better able to see not only the whole position, but how the various parts within the position can be reconfigured to book incremental profits as market S/R channels evolve. We can work to improve our rate of return, given ever evolving market prices. Use a spreadsheet and the associated chart set to plan out alternatives based on those details. The full chart set should include a current monthly, weekly, daily, & hourly chart to understand what's happening in each major timeframe. For each timeframe, ask:
Simply put (and assuming survivable investments), when the boom-bust cycle favors stocks, every sell-off is a stock buying opportunity; and when the cycle does not favor stocks, every rally is a stock selling opportunity. The same is true for bonds, etc. This is the first timing skill to work on and, in due time, master — trading with the broader economic trend; and then work to master quicker market cycles. Be long up trending securities (issues that are likely to benefit from the upcoming phase of the business cycle), be short (or simply avoid) down trending issues, and be in cash when a healthy broader market trend is unavailable (the charts are showing you CRAP). Having a big cash account makes it easier to take advantage of the next favorable opportunity. Be a buyer (scale in) at discount prices (a bounce off support, the lower-end of the current trading range), and a seller at premium prices (resistance, the upper-end of the current trading range). Always start your technical analysis using longer-term charts, like monthly and weekly charts to better understand where the market is relative to the boom-bust cycle (to see the broader market trend), then use shorter-term charts to find buying and selling opportunities (to find deviations away from that broader market trend), like on daily and hourly charts (refer to Seeing The Market's Big Picture above).
Basically, we want to develop and use our Market Timing skills to maximize our rate of return on invested capital, and use Security Selection and Asset Allocation to minimize the impact when we get our Timing wrong. We cannot control market prices, but we can control our buying and selling, and what securities we'll specialize in. We only want to commit capital to opportunities that clearly favor the growth of our account, given our current abilities. When it comes to buying an investment (scaling into or adding to an existing position), we want to focus on above average investments (opportunities) that are trading at below average price (we want to take advantage of counter-trend moves in a healthy broader market trend); and when it comes to selling our investment (scaling back out of an existing position), there are two reasons to exit:
In taxable accounts, it pays to wait for the market to offer up truly favorable odds, like being a buyer near 52-week lows or major support and a seller near 52-week highs or major resistance. It's often best to play the full economic boom-bust cycle to minimize the tax-burden, which reduces the rate of capital growth by reducing the size of the reinvestment.
Take comfort in the wisdom found in my Simple 2-by-4 Approach. Rate of return can and will improve as our skills and capital base grow. It is the benefits of a compound growth curve that is growing in our favor.
This tried-and-true formula has allowed me and many others to preserve capital (avoid real disasters) in bad times and to seriously grow (well above the market rate of return) our capital base (the size of our brokerage accounts) in good times. It is best to start while we are young and able to earn normal job income. Learn how to save 10% or as much as we can (learn to Pay Yourself First) and to live with the remaining balance. In time we should be able to acquirable the skill and capital needed to fund and sustain a comfortably retirement.
If we get a quote from Mr. Market for any stock, bond or whatever security has caught our attention, we're likely to see five pieces of information: The Bid Price (the price a willing buyer will pay for our shares at a trading venue), the Ask Price (the price a willing seller is offering to accept for their shares), the Last Price (the price of the latest trade recorded on the Ticker Tape for all to see), and the 52-Week High and Low Prices (the range of prices seen on the Ticker Tape over that prior year). This should prompt us to ask, "How can a security trade for such a wide range of prices when the underling business that issued that security did not likely change all that much over that same period of time?" Maybe Mr. Market's quotes really are irrational and not the best measure of the value for that security. So, what would be a better measure of value? Some prefer to use a Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E) [e.g., the current market price of a share of stock divided by the prior year's (or next year's expected) Earnings-per-Share (EPS) for that stock]. Many savvy professionals prefer to use the Earnings Yield for stocks, which is just an inverted P/E (EPS divided by Price) because that makes it easier to compare the yield on a stock to the yield on a bond from that same business or other companies in similar businesses. Let's assuming a business (on the simplest level) is just a Money Machine [i.e., we invest some capital (e.g., money, intellectual property, etc.) into a repeatable business process and that business makes some money, it generates a profit, it Yields a Rate-of-Return over time on that invested capital, and that's money that can be used to first pay the debt (bond) holders (their periodic interest payments and then return the principal or the amount loaned to the business at maturity or some future date) and to reward the (stock) owners of that business (either in the form of dividends or by re/investing in new money making opportunities available to managers of that business) — that Yield is a much better measure of value because it is based on the relationship between market price and an ability of that business to make money]. Another MBA level way to view a value relationship is to think of the rate of return on (profit from) a business opportunity versus (over) the cost to fund that opportunity (i.e., the rate of return divided by the current bond market yield for that timeframe or whatever alternative funding is available). We do this to understand if the often variable rate of return (likely profit margins) from the proposed investment is worth the generally fixed-cost of capital given available investment yield alternatives. Bottom line, it's always best to invest in securities issued by businesses that generate Higher Yields (i.e., it's best to be a buyer at relatively higher yields and a seller at lower yields) assuming all other things are equal (which is rarely the case when we consider alternative investment opportunities; but is always the case when the only thing that is changing, is the Price of a specific security).
There are other financial ratios savvy value investors use to gage the profitability and the risks of a business. The first is Return-on-Assets, which is an indication of how profitable a company is relative to the total capital investment into that business — note that Total Assets (the value creation parts of the business) is equal to the sum of all the capital invested in that business, which is the sum of both debt and equity, it's an accounting Balance Sheet relationship. The second is Return-on-Equity, which is an indication of profitability relative to just the (stock) owner's investment in the business (the lower-right-hand part of that same Balance Sheet). Another ratio is Debt-to-Equity, which shows how much of the capital investment is due to debt, which can kill a business when a cyclical downturn naturally reduces a business' ability to generate the cash needed to meet its debt obligations. I recommend Chris Haroun's Introduction to Finance, Accounting, Modeling and Valuation offered on Udemy.com. If you want to take your investing to the next level, to be a true fundamentally based investor, you have to be able to understand a business' SEC filings, you need to understand Basic Accounting, which is the language of business and means you need to learn how to read basic accounting statements. The primary instruments are the Balance Sheet, Income Statement, and Cash-Flow Statement. These financial ratios (and many others) all come from these accounting statements. Historically speaking, forensic accountants, the pros that know how to slice and dice these statements, tend to detect financial shenanigans in the footnotes of these SEC filings — C-Suite Managers of publicly traded companies have to report the facts that can affect the valuation of the business that they run in a GAAP format, but there is a lot of room for interpretation in the GAAP guidelines and the best way to comply with the legal reporting requirements while still obfuscating the truth is the report the evidence in a murky footnote. Being able to comprehend the financial documents of a publicly traded company is the professional approach to understanding a business and therefore be better informed as to the likely future value of an investable security, and another way that the pros protects themselves from the emotional whirlwind unleashed by Mr. Market. When considering these and other measures of value, it's best to look at the trend relative to time and to competitors to understand if the business is getting better or worse.
If all the math seen in the prior two paragraphs is a bit too much for you, then use a Monthly chart and only be a buyer when prices are trading in the lower half of the trading range seen there (the multi-decade S/R Channel). The lower half of this trading range is where the market perceives discount prices and the upper half is where premium prices exist. Fast-money momentum traders and the uninformed will drive prices (advance the current trend) into the waiting arms of savvy value investors that can do the fundamental analysis and math and are willing to wait for the favorable prices that exist near the channel extremes. By the way, if your stock ticker or the index that your fund is designed to track cannot fill that long-term monthly chart, you may not be looking at a survivable security. Market prices for most survivable investments tend to have a normal (bell shaped) distribution over longer timeframes, and most future prices are very likely to fall within that prior Major Support and Resistance Channel; plus stock prices, unlike bond prices, will tend to have their S/R Channels drift upwards over time thanks to economic growth and inflation. This bit of wisdom is more than useful, it's very powerful for those with longer investment horizons and for those with the patience to wait for favorable prices; But it's important to also remember that the future is unknowable and that anything possible can still happen, and then what will you do? Do you have a plan for the extremely unlikely? Don't use this powerful wisdom to justify an otherwise excessively risky trade that can result in a big mistake. Being more of a buyer in the lower half of the broader trading range and more of a seller in the premium half is the foundation of successful investing, and the primary reason Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) works. And once you've achieved CPT status trading a Monthly chart, try to reproduce the same results on a Weekly chart, and so on.
An economically appropriate asset allocation, as suggested above, would have us focus the bulk of our time and capital on issues that are likely to do better in the upcoming phase of the current business cycle. For example, riskier issues, like small-caps funds and high-yield (junk-bond) funds, tend to do better coming out of a Market Bottom (i.e., Full Recession in the idealized Sector Rotation Model diagram above); and blue-chip issues, like large-cap stocks and top-quality corporate bond funds, tend to do better as prices rally into Market Tops. But life does not always go according to plan, plus there's a lot of sector rotation that occurs in every phase of the business cycle. Having an uncorrelated (or at least loosely correlated) Asset Allocation is a great way to reduce risk and improve total return in any portfolio. It's a great way to profit from market and economic surprises. It's also a great way to play all those seemingly random cycles within cycles within the business cycle. Note that the time to enter (scale in) is when an issue, group or sector is out of favor, but seem to no longer go down on bad new; and the time to exit (scale out) is when that security, group or sector receives favorable attention in the media and you've got nice profit to harvest — also notice that if prices fail to rally on good or favorable news and commentary, it's a clear sign that the pros are selling and so should you. We see this pattern all the time — a stock, group of stocks or an industrial sector will make a big move, trending up or down for months, and be the focus of the popular media for weeks with prices trading at a 52-week (or an all-time) high or low, but a year later we see a big reversal; last year's big winner or loser will often be the next year's big loser or winner, assuming that the businesses have a survivable business model. This rotation model extends across all markets. For example, International securities often lag the U.S. Market; but more importantly, these issues, like bonds and natural resources (commodities), are loosely correlated to U.S. stocks and give us an opportunity to build a more diversified asset allocation. By focusing a smaller portion of our time and capital on a few other loosely correlated issues that can survive volatile market cycles and that will pay a market rate of return to hold (like SPY for U.S. Large-Cap Stocks, IWM for U.S. Small-Cap Stocks, EFA for International Large-Caps, TEI for International Small-Caps, GGN for Gold and other Natural Resources & PKO for Bonds — these are ETFs and CEFs), as markets (and market sectors) cycle through bull and bear trends (the Sector Rotation Model diagram above identifies the market sectors that tend to do best in the various phases of the business cycle, click here to see a video about Sectors Summary tools, and here for other models).
On the subject of appropriate asset allocation, let's not forget about Cash, which is completely uncorrelated to all other asset classes. It's the opportunity asset class. The market presents opportunities all the time, but we need to have ready cash to take advantage of these. Just remember, it's generally easy to get into an investment; but not so easy to get out with an acceptable, risk-adjusted profit. Consider the professional approach to investing — think of all possible outcomes, assign a probability to each outcome, plan-out your operations for each possible outcome (including the unexpected outcome, which tends to mean close the position and re-evaluate), trade your plan, and revise that plan when presented with new information. A healthy cash account facilitates this professional approach to investing.
I can't always tell you which stock or group of stocks or bonds (whatever) will go in or out of favor next (honestly, I don't think any market guru can with any consistency, but with specialization we can grow an ability to get some of these right). But I can tell you, for sure, that all (one or more at a time) will cycle through their longer-term S/R Channel. Without exception, sooner or later, and to one degree or another, all mature issues in every groups and sectors will rotate in and out of favor over time — will trend down, be out of favor, find a bottom (major support), which assumes survival, will trend back up, be in favor, find a top (major resistance), and repeat the cycle over-and-over again. Why? It's the nature of the economy, the underlying factors driving the patterns seen over time, and by extension the data. All we need is a way to understand (analyze) that data (and with specialization we can grow an ability to better understand the data) and a strategy that puts the odds in our favor. We don't have to try to pick the winners and losers or time the tops and bottoms to make good money; we only have to find a few survivable securities that will pay us to hold, and a set of likely (limit order) prices that can exploit the data's nature. For example, we can do our buying near the lows (off support, preferably major support, as seen on longer-term charts), and do our selling near the highs (or whenever we've earned an acceptable, above average profit). We want to capture the lion's share of most of these seemingly random cyclical moves, whenever they occur. Once our limit orders are setup, we only have to wait for the market to come to us and tell use which security to play. You don't have to know the first thing about economics or fundamental analysis, just enough technical analysis to find likely support and resistance levels (an ability to see the big picture). Does this sound like a profitable strategy? I can assure you that it is a time-tested winner, most of the time! But trust me, no strategy is fool proof. Knowing a little economics and other market wisdom (like that presented in this paper) will help, a lot, when the tenor of the market changes and throws a monkey wrench (or wooden shoe) in your precious little money machine. Please note that a good strategy (trading plan) also addresses what to do when we see monkey wrenches flying — the Wall Street talking-heads like to say, "Just get out and re-evaluate the situation", which is not a wholly bad idea, but we may be able to find a better stop-loss strategy ... keep on reading.
The popular media likes to talk about the direction of the current trend and the difference between recent highs and lows or the year-to-date gain or loss. These talking-heads like to promote a fast-money trading mentality, by suggesting how much could have been made or saved if only investors (newbie traders) could buy the bottoms and sell the tops. It is important to understand that everyone has an agenda to promote. The media wants to whip-up the reader's, listener's and viewer's emotions to get and keep them tuned-in for the sale of further ad space and time. The professional money managers and commentators want you to invest through them or buy their newsletter or service. As a result, many retail investors (newbie traders) act as if making money is all about quickly spotting the current trend and then beating the crowd in and out via market orders; and as a result, many look for some information or fast-trading-system advantage. They tend to be one-dimensional traders, focused on the current short-term trend in only one timeframe (e.g., a daily chart), and they tend to spend way too much time and money trying to time tops and bottoms and buying an information edge (e.g., newsletters and tip sheets; if these sources had real market value, the originators would be secretly applying that knowledge in their own brokerage account or running a hedge fund) in hopes of hitting a home run trade — this is a fool's errand, a Snipe Hunt, a Loser's Game — Winning requires making fewer errors than the competition (i.e., avoiding real losses). As Charles Ellis points out in his book Winning the Loser's Game, it is extremely unlikely that retail investors will ever make any real long-term money over time playing this game. Understand that professional day-traders and their computer systems account for more than 75% of all the trading volume; and they're the ones with the real information and speed advantage. Even if you are better than average, you are just not going to consistently out-trade the real fast-money pros (the real average trader by volume), which is what it take to be CPT. So how do the big (successful) fund managers make money (earn alpha) in this environment?
Large professional fund managers scale in and out of their various positions. They understand that price is not always a good indication of value and tend to trade against current market sentiment (e.g., when the market is bearish, trending down, and creating discount prices, it's these large value-based investors taking the other side of that fast-money trade, one small trade after another and thus avoiding the risk of tipping their hand — there's a big buyer in this bear market). They only make a trade, generally via limit orders, when a trade is likely to favor the growth of their account (i.e., by buying at discount prices and selling at premium prices). They (or members of their team) specialize on a few investments (study the market's nature, now and in the past) and do their homework (fundamental and technical analysis) to gain an information edge (a better understanding of likely future value), and then only play strategies that have favorable odds in the current market environment. They know that tops and bottoms can only be seen on charts after the fact, and that once the current trend becomes clear it's also likely to reverse, that markets do tend to generate similar cyclical patterns, but every moment in the market is still unique and anything possible (no matter how unlikely) can still happen. It's all about being well informed, managing their risk exposure, and playing the odds in a methodical, repeatable manner. Making real money is all about being able to consistently generate one profit after another, over and over again, and not about finding the next home run trade. They understand that it is more that possible (often likely) to capture a judicious amount (but not all) of any cyclical move in an S/R Channel (the area on the chart between the tops and bottoms, the current trading range) when appropriate tactics are applied; but attempting to capture too much of the whole move requires excess risk and can easily generate diminishing returns. Furthermore, these pros realize that one has to be in the market to earn the market rate of return, and that prices can always go higher or lower, and when they do go higher or lower, these savvy investors are being given the opportunity to take even greater advantage of the available premium or discount (by scaling further in and out because they've held in reserve some of their trading power) and thus helping to create the expected correction and setting up the next cyclical swing. These experts are multidimensional, they trade using three or more chart timeframes. For example, if they are trading a daily chart, they'll use a weekly and monthly charts to spot major support and resistance levels, they'll use the direction and spread between current prices the major MAs on these chart (as introduced above), and also use economic data to anticipate and evaluate the health of the broader market trend; and if the trend is healthy (likely to continue), they'll then use counter trend moves on the daily chart to buy at available discount prices and to sell at available premium prices, as prices pivot back towards the broader market trend on a quicker timeframe (e.g., an hourly or 15-minute chart; refer to Triple Screen Trading in Trading for a Living). Professionals methodically work to beat their professional objectives (e.g., to beat their benchmark index or their targeted rate of return with a low Sharpe Ratio) by:
With one exception, we can earn an 8 to 12% total return by simply trading like (with) these large professional fund managers. We simply need to focus our time and money on a small, diversified collection of survivable securities that will pay us to hold. We can develop an information edge over time by staying focused on the same small list and learning to effectively apply the information presented above and elsewhere. Be buyers (averaging in) at discount prices and sellers at premium prices when a trade favors our capital interest (i.e., when we have an information edge). We can use the time-tested ideas introduced above, and current economic and technical information to plan and drive our operations. The one exception, some professionals use leverage to magnify their returns, which is money that's generally borrowed from our broker and is also known as Margin. If you're not a Consistently Profitable Trader (CPT) who's able to monitor positions in real-time, you should not be using leverage. When the market turns on a leveraged position, if not handled properly, that position can quickly lose (sometimes even more than the) principal investment. Note that we cannot unconditionally hold a leveraged position when the market turns against that position because our broker has the right (and responsibility) to close that position, without notice, and well do so before any loss eats into the their capital — the borrowed money, which means the borrower alone (you) eat all the losses. Retail investors should stay off margin!
Wall Street talking-head say, "Never average down!" and this may seem to be a direct contradiction to what I'm advocating in this paper. But this is really not the case. Our primary goal is not to out trade the professional shorter-term trend traders (the fast-Money crowd). It's to be a better investor by out trading the professional longer-term fund manager. First let's understand why they say "Never average down."
Second, let's get clear on what I am advocating — The Main Strategy — is to avoid most, if not all, of those shorter-term trading stop-losses that can just kill an account over time by being a longer-term investor (a CPT) that can use shorter-term trading tactics to improve on the market rate of return:
We need to think like longer-term investors that can depend on economic growth to yield Beta (the Market Rate of Return) and that can also use shorter-term trading tactics (the skill to earn Alpha) to enhance our total returns when these market opportunities present themselves. This is a strategy that just about anybody can do, if they are willing to work for it; unlike trying to be the next super-star, fast-money, professional trader, which is something very few have any real chance of ever becoming. The primary stop-loss we want to take is when the market and economic data suggests (a credible message of the markets) suggests that the broader market trend (the business cycle) is ready to turn against our position. (Sure the security may survive a big drop; but why sit on a growing drawdown when that capital can be put to better use elsewhere?) We'll use this strategy, a set of charts (weekly, daily, and an intraday) and a spreadsheet to plan out our investment. We want to literately answers the question, "If I make this trade (buy a bounce off or a drop into support, as indicated by a prior pivot low, a rising MA or an oversold RSI indication), what will I do if price goes as I expect — rally to resistance (at what likely price can I harvest my profits), and what will I do if prices drop through this support level and advance to lower support levels on the way to major support?" I plan to buy each level in greater size to pull down my cost-basis, thus making it easier to realize a nice total return in a likely future upturn. Once an investment is planned out, trade that plan — use limit orders and/or price alerts to execute the plan. Take comfort in the fact that this strategy, proper planning and execution puts the odds in our favor, and that sooner or later we'll realize our targeted rate of total return. This is called Trading our Timeframe's Support and Resistance Channel.
There will be times, from time-to-time, when a best-of-bread blue-chip stock (or its sector ETF) is a very good buy. These opportunities tend to occur when a stock and the sector it trades with is out of favor and has been so for a while, but no longer goes down on more bad news (i.e., the group has already made a big move down and is now testing major support — There's an old saying that applies perfectly, "Never try to catch a falling knife, it's always best to let it hit the ground and vibrate a little before you reach for the handle."). This dogs of the dow or S&P 500 (deep-value based) approach can result in some amazing returns when that position is held to the other extreme. The sector's leading (best-of-bread) stock is the kind of issue that can pull that sector back into favor; but it will take time, a lot of it, if the position is started too soon after a big fall. Another slightly less attractive example would be when an appealing stock or sector is hit by surprisingly bad news (or commentary) and has a huge sell-off on the day the news hits the tape. In this case, it's best to apply the "Three-day Rule." — Give the stock (or sector) time to wash-out. Let all those who'll need to sell, do so. Put another way, let the falling knife hit the ground, find real support, before starting a new long in the stock (or the best-of-bread stock in that sector). This second opportunity maybe another buy the dip play or it may be a dead cat bounce play because this case can easily turn out to be the beginning of a new bear phase in a stock (or sector) that was in a prior market leading bull phase. The difference generally boils down to the nature of the drop (sell-off). If the drop was to a rising MA, we're probably looking at buy the dip. However, if the knife cut through the rising MAs, we're probably looking a a dead cat bounce towards an MA before find new resistance, that was prior support. Honestly, it's hard to pick the perfect bottom and sometimes is just best to buy a little early and add to the position when better or other favorable opportunities present themselves. If the initial buy looks like a mistake, use bigger intervals of time and price when scaling further in (assuming my Simple 2-by-4 Approach above). But if you find yourself breaking these rules, consider taking the loss and chalking-it-up as another expensive lesson of what not to do. Alternatively, risk can be reduced by using the sector ETF, but the reward will also be reduced too. The strategy will require the ability to see (understand) when the market has driven prices to an unsustainable extreme (be selling at ridiculous discounts relative to longer-term economic prospects) and the ability to build and manage a big position in a security that can and will not only survive that extreme market sell-off, but can and will lead that group to the other extreme (a new longer-term top). This is how the big-money pros make that big money, and we can do that too. It only takes a few of these big money trades in a life-time to create a wonderful, life-long retirement account, and it can be done with the knowledge present here, enough investment capital, and just a few survivable investments that will pay us to hold.
Let's take a deeper look at Compounding.
It's the mechanism that should allow us to generate the large capital base
we'll need for the big trade described above.
In the ideal sense,
it's earning new money on top of prior earnings from prior savings,
and is the real (not so) secret to wealth creation (and destruction).
We normally think of compounding as being something that happens at regular intervals
because interest and dividends are normally paid at regular intervals,
assuming those cash payments are then reinvested to earn even more,
thus creating a non-linear (upward sloping) growth curve over longer periods of time.
Compounding can also occur at irregular intervals too
(e.g., buy stock XYZ for $10 per share and sell it later for $11
to earn a 10% holding period rate of return,
then use all the proceeds from that sale to buy back in at $10 and
later sell again for $11 —
or simply buying support and selling resistance along the broader market trend over-and-over again).
Each profitable trade (capital reinvestment) completed over variable timeframes is also an opportunity for compound growth.
And for those who prefer a Buy-and-Hold strategy to minimize the tax burden,
stocks (and by extension stock indices) are able to grow at a compound rate,
during the boom-phase of the economic/market cycle,
when the underlying business(es) is(are) able to grow or create value at a compound rate,
thanks to that business retaining earnings and reinvesting in profitable growth opportunities
and/or buying back shares (making each outstanding share worth more because of the greater claim on that business).
The two most import things to understand about compounding is:
1) it is the mathematical magic that creates wealth over time
when a string of reinvested payments (profits) are run together one-after-another, and
2) a string of losses, one-after-another, yields compound wealth distraction,
and is the primary reason why we need to trade like a longer-term professional investors
and not like the popularly touted short-term, fast-money, professional traders
(a Loser's Game for all but the best-of-the-best).
The following two statements are both true: 1) It is much easier to realize a positive rate of return over longer timeframes. 2) Better rates of return are realized by positive returns earned over quicker (shorter) timeframes (and the inverse is also true — a string of quick losses can grow at a compound rate too and can dramatically reduce the size of a brokerage account, and that is why most shorter-term trend traders get wiped out, they endure a number of small stop-losses while trying to get a win large enough to overcome all those little losses, transaction costs and other cost associated with being in the business and still realize a rate of return that justifies the risks taken). So please do not confuse better rates of return with easier. Many do, and that's one of the main reasons so many are attracted to trading. Many buy into the Wall Street marketing hype that likes to talk about some of the amazing rates of return realized by some pros in the market, pros that can effectively play the Winner's Game, and they says things like, "You can trade like a pro too, if you trade with us and ..." We all like to think, "We're better than average." and "I should be able to out-trade the average market participant." Please understand that Wall Street needs new investors and trader to make their big short-term profits, and they do a lot of marketing to attract that new (dumb or just uninformed) money. There's a reason why more than 95% of all new traders eventually quit after losing all or almost all of their trading capital, it's very hard to be a Consistently Profitable Trader (CPT) when your focus is on getting a home-run hit (e.g., finding quick trading profits from big break-out or break-down moves that require a stop-loss when ticker show a small loss). Please understand that most tickers spend most of their time in a trading range, and when most tickers break-out or break-down, the current trading range is just shifting up or down, or maybe expanding now (becoming more volatile) and will soon settle down to a new tighter trading range that may be higher or lower. A Consistently Profitable Trader understands this reality and employs strategies that take advantage of the natural behavior. They're focus is on hitting singles and doubles over-and-over again. Most CPTs only takes trades that are very likely to yield a positive total return sooner or later; and that's why a CPT is able to consistently generate wealth in their targeted trading timeframe. A year, quarter, month, week or a day are all examples of trading timeframes; where yearly is the easiest timeframe to earn CPT status and daily CPTs have the potential to earn some of the very best rates of return. Problem is, very few will ever be able to realize weekly, much less daily CPT status. Most of new traders, who can and have earned some money in the market, tend to eventually end up losing it trying to out-trade the market because they confuse short-term random success with real trading skill. Please understand that the average retail market participant is not going to out-trade the real pros, and that it is just a matter of time before the pros drain your trading account, just as it's a matter of time until a Vegas Casino wins almost every unskilled dollar put a risk. Don't play that short-term trading game (until you've earn short-term CPT status)! Alternatively, your primary goal should always be to make money over time (to be a CPT in whatever timeframe you can master). Initially work to achieve year-after-year CPT status, a very doable objective when you use the wisdom presented above; and then work to reproduce CPT results in slightly quicker timeframes, like quarter-after-quarter, and then in time maybe month-after-month. If you can achieve CPT status month-after-month you will have realized a goal that far exceeds 85% of all market participants; and week-after-week is really super-star CPT status and way better than 95% of market pros. It's amazing to me how many new traders act like they believe they can just do this — beat the market at its own game. Sure, no one is ever going to have a perfect record (prices go up and down all the time, and so will the value of our portfolio), but having a perfect trading record is not the real goal. The real goal, once again, is to grow the size of our portfolio over time, the definitions of a CPT above. If we plot the size of our equity on a graph (a chart), we should see an uptrend something like the idealize uptrend figure above; and ideally, we'd like to find and exploit our optimal positive rate of return, which initially is going to be over the longest timeframe. Initially our equity uptrend line will be closer to horizontal than vertical, but in time we should see it curve up as our rate of return improves and as compounding kicks in. Start by learning how to capture the long-term market rate of return; for example, just own a broad-based market investment like VBINX, which passively yields a balanced exposure to both the stock and bond markets. This initial approach is best when you are just starting out via dollar cost averaging because you do not yet have enough capital (cash) saved to effectively invest. During this preliminary phase, you should study the information presented above and the real-time data; use that to plan and trade a paper portfolio. In time you should have some real capital saved up and you should also be developing a feel for the market, and that is when you should enter the second phase — learning how to eliminate much of market's long-term negative returns. Start small (only invest a small portion of your savings) in just three funds like VMMXX, VTSMX, and VBMFX, which provides exposure to a money market fund to hold cash for future buying opportunities, exposure to just the whole stock market and just the whole bond market. As you demonstrate real positive results, increase the size of your exposure to this actively managed part of your portfolio. The idea here is to learn how to exploit the market's boom-bust cycles (longest-term S/R levels) with real cash. Paper trading is good as a planning tool, but it is not the same as having real cash exposed to risk. The big question at this time of your personal growth is, Who is managing your account? The Trading Idiot or someone who has the self-discipline to use an simple strategy that has a time-tested positive track record, to methodically analyze the market for favorable trading opportunities, to plan out each trade, to trade that plan, to track the P&L details, and to learn from the results. Once you start to see some real positive results (i.e., your account is growing in both good times and bad, and you are starting to feel like some of that growth is in fact due to your effective operations), then use a small percent of your growing capital base to see if you can reproduce these results in slightly quicker intervals. You can also try to using more effective securities like CEFs and ETFs, which trade all day (the three Vanguard open-end mutual funds above only trade once per day, at the next 4 PM closing price). If and when your new, quicker operations prove to be less effective, as they will initially and from time-to-time, take a step back and recapture the prior success in a longer timeframe. Understand that markets evolve over time, and shorter-term strategies that worked in the past may no longer work as effectively in the future. Learn to be flexible and to adapt to changing times. The goal in this later (mature) phase is to find and exploit your Optimally Effective Timeframe (OET), where you can earn your highest possible rate of return by exploiting S/R levels in quicker timeframes; but there will be times when bigger (longer) timeframe trends or corrections will impact your quicker timeframes, and if you're focused on survivable securities that will pay you to hold, you can scale in and out using LIFO accounting to more effectively work your invested capital to better manage the average price per share (cost basis) and the average rate of return for each part of an open position, which also improving the odds of realizing a lower tax bill on the early trades just like a big professional value-based fund manager. Plus at this time, every investment held for a year and a day or long enjoys the lower Long-Term Capital Gains Tax Rate and LIFO improves the odds that this can happen. Be patient and persistent, and never forget that it is naturally harder to consistently realize higher rates of return. So you are going to need to work for, and that it is going to take time and real personal growth to achieve the higher rates of return that can beat the broader market averages. Understand that it can be done, lots of people have developed this skill and you can too; but it requires an understanding of (and trust in) this strategy (or your own effective CPT strategy), lots of capital (personal savings), the self-discipline to work the strategy and develop the skill needed to earn the desired proceeds. There is no Santa Claus and there are no easy fortunes made on Wall Street.
Have you ever wondered, "What is doing better?" "Is money flowing to riskier assets or to safer assets?" "Are we in a "Risk-On" or "Risk-Off" environment?" The next two charts address these questions. They use StockCharts.com's Relative Strength Comparison option to setup a useful ratio (e.g., Ticker A over Ticker B or A divided by B or A/B, via "A:B" ticker notation), which allows a ticker to be compared against its benchmark index to see if a ticker in a group of tickers is leading, lagging or just tracking its broader index, a form of relative strength comparison (don't confuse this with RSI). It can also be used to compare the relative performance of two competitive tickers and that is what we're doing in these two charts. The first looks at Small-Caps vs. Large-Cap Stocks (ETFs). Small-Caps are generally start-ups and riskier issues that can grow faster in a better economic environments and Large-Caps are the safer Blue-Chips that almost always do okay in both good times and bad. So, is money flowing into Large-Caps or Small-Caps? The first chart answers that question. In the top panel, we see a line chart of the Total U.S. Stock market, which was grinding higher at that time. In the lower panel, we see a ratio of Small-Caps (IWM = The Russel 2000 Index ETF) vs. Large-Caps (SPY = S&P 500 ETF) or Riskier investments Vs. Safer Investments, with a 20-day MA to smooth out normal trading noise. When these lines go up, money is flowing into Small-Caps (Riskier Investments) and out of Large-Caps, a Risk-On environment. The current chart is generally down, a Risk-Off environment, after initially going up, a Risk-On environment. Money is lately flowing into Large-Caps and out of Small-Caps. I know from other charts at the time, money was flowing to Apple, Microsoft and Amazon, the three largest of the Large-Caps (about 16% of that large-cap index) while most other stocks are going down or sideways and that is why the Stock Index looks bullish but is actually "Not So Much." However, in a week or so, Warning Season will come to an end and prices should rally into the next Earnings Season, and that is why I was buying the dips at that time. This is an example of how I read The Tape (the charts, etc.), a historic record of all the news and trades hitting Wall Street. The next chart looks at the bond market. In the top panel, we see ticker BND, the ETF for the Total U.S. Bond Market Index, which is in an uptrend after putting in a near-term bottom. In the lower panel we see a ratio between HYG the "High-Yield Index ETF" and TLT the "U.S. Treasury Index ETF" or "Risk-On" Vs. "Risk-Off" (or Profit Seeking Vs The Safety Trade), which was signaling a Risk-Off environment. Money was flowing into U.S. Treasuries and out of Riskier Bonds.
The market for tradable securities can be, at times, a bit maddening; offering an amazing range of prices, some prices will be ridiculously low and at other times unbelievably high. Without a time-tested strategy (a plan) that we understand, trust, and that puts the odds in our favor, we can easily find ourselves buying when prices are high (when a security is popular) and selling when prices are low (out of favor). It's hard to predict future prices, and any strategy that requires that to be successful is doomed to failure, unless you are truly able to effectively play the Winner's Game. But it's not too hard to recognize the broader market (economic) trend as it goes through boom-and-bust cycles. Short-term traders will naturally push the current trend forward until it becomes overdone, to a level where current prices are an unrealistic reflection of likely future outcomes, to discount and premium levels that attract large savvy value investors (big fund managers) that create support and resistance levels that force trend reversals back towards the mean away from the extremes. We can take advantage of this behavior by trading with the broader market trend and against deviations away from that trend, exploiting a natural reversion to the mean — Trading our Timeframe's Support and Resistance Channel. If a security can survive volatile markets and will pay us to hold, earning an acceptable total return is just a matter of time, and thus giving us a real hold option (we can choose to ignore most minor correction related stop-loss requirements, the curse of trading), which avoids locking in avoidable losses. Money lost or squandered away on worthless products and services or popular counterproductive tactics cannot grow to support our retirement needs. However, when the broader economic trend turns on us or signals that it is likely to turn, we simply must close or greatly reduce the size of those positions that are likely to be significantly diminished by a turn in the business cycle. We need to build a small list of survivable (preferably un- or at least loosely-correlated) issues that will pay a market rate of return to hold, thus allowing us to profit from natural market rotations and surprises. Getting to know this list of tickers well (becoming a specialist in each of them) gives us a real trading advantage and puts the odds in our favor. This knowledge, with a little planning (use a spreadsheet and maybe a notebook to plan, track, and analyze results), and lots of patience are the keys to success in this business. Having a strategy that puts the odds in our favor, planning and the self-discipline to work that plan are the attributes that differentiate the professional from the wannabes. All we have to do is plan (target) our entry and exit prices, and then wait for the market to come to us; and once in a position, manage our cost-basis, the position's break-even (average) price. When market prices turn on our position (giving us a drawdown), we can work to keep that average price (our cost-basis) as close to the current market price as possible, thus allowing any upswing to be an opportunity to harvest an acceptable rate of return. Scale (average) in at discount prices (make each subsequent buy interval or size larger, thus more effectively pulling down the position's average price) and scale back out at premium prices (using Last In First Out or LIFO accounting to minimize the tax burden and to maximize the rate of return on each transaction, more on this in the next paragraph). We are thus more likely to earn our targeted rate of return (via capital appreciation, income or a combination). This is how the big professional fund managers do it, and we can do it too.
The Fast Money (best professional day-traders) focus on trends with positive relative strength (issues that lead an index higher or lower). They stick with the current trend until that trend runs into major support or resistance and reverses. They then take a quick stop-loss trade and reverse their prior trade until prices reach the other end of the current trading range. Thus, defining and refining the size of the current trading range. The best way I know how to lose money quickly and persistently is to trade like this, thinking I only need to be better than average. The average fast money trader is a professional with a track record of success. They specialize in this trading technique, and they generally specialize on a relatively small list of securities. They are the best traders in the world, and everyone else is, What? Not them! It is very unlikely that most will every become professional fast money traders. But we don't have to become one of them to make money in the markets.
The Smart Money (best professional investors) focus on mean reversion; and kept their operations in-synch with the broader economic trend. They are the smart money because they know how this game is played. They know that market prices spend most of the time within the broader trading range, cycling around the broader trading range average. A range that reflects the market collective view of likely future value. Plus, they know how to do the fundamental analysis required (or can pay to get it) to build profitable investment models for the securities they specialize in. They do their buying at relative discounts and their selling at relative premiums (i.e., they scale-in in the lower half of the current and broader trading range, and they scale back out in the upper half of the current and broader trading range). Their increasing size creates the major support and resistance that cause the fast money trends to reverse over-and-over again. There is a natural symbiotic relations ship between these two groups of professionals. The best way I know how to make money slowly and persistently in the market is to learn how to see (in longer-term charts) how the smart money play their game, and then learn how to trade with them. Thus, becoming a CPT and allowing compounding to do the heavy lifting that can create amazing wealth in the market over longer periods of time.
Big moves in the market happen when the pros are surprised by unexpected news. This forces both the fast money and smart money to trade to avoid big loses. When fast money suddenly finds themselves on the wrong side of the broader market trend, they take a stop-loss to exit and then re-enter on the right size. Thus, both fast money trades push the current trend forward. Professional fund managers (the smart money) are constantly being compared to their benchmark index. They can keep their million dollar salary jobs by just keeping up with their benchmark. It's okey to underperform a little. Everyone knows that 80 to 90% of all fund managers underperform their benchmark by a little because their benchmark is a mathematical construct that does not have to deal with real trading costs. All fund managers must deal with normal market inefficiencies, a simple fact of investment life. But they will lose their job if they significantly underperform that benchmark. So, when the smart money finds themselves holding too much cash and not enough of the surprising move, they start to pyramid in, that too pushes the new primary trend forward. The move continues until all the trading power is spend, which is also about the time when current prices no longer reflect the likely future value of the security or index in motion, which is also about when prices reach the edge of the broadest trading range. The best way I know how to profit from this is to just own survivable investments, that'll pay you to hold, like a total stock market index fund or some of the big blue-chip issues in that index that have positive relative strength. These are tickers that can fill a monthly chart because they have been trading for decades. Just scale in (be a buyer) when prices are in the lower half that broader trading range and scale back out (be a seller, book profits, and raise cash to re-invest) when prices are in the upper half of that trading range.
Click here to see a summarize of My Market Insights and how I apply the information above to earn a living, here to see a detailed example of how I plan out and manage a CEF (and ETF) position based on the information above, click here to learn more about my Trading and Investing Rules for retirement, and here to review my old Prop. Trading Notebook.